Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25161 - 25170 of 30070 for de.
Search results 25161 - 25170 of 30070 for de.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
affairs of the Church anytime thereafter. ¶27 An appellate court interprets a circuit court’s order de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1072071 - 2026-02-03
affairs of the Church anytime thereafter. ¶27 An appellate court interprets a circuit court’s order de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1072071 - 2026-02-03
State v. Elbert Whitelaw
. Whether counsel's performance is prejudicial is a question of law we review de novo. State v. Pitsch, 124
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8630 - 2005-03-31
. Whether counsel's performance is prejudicial is a question of law we review de novo. State v. Pitsch, 124
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8630 - 2005-03-31
2009 WI APP 157
, our review is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 315–317, 401 N.W.2d 816
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40585 - 2009-10-27
, our review is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 315–317, 401 N.W.2d 816
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40585 - 2009-10-27
2007 WI APP 18
of law that this court reviews de novo. Torgerson v. Journal/Sentinel, Inc., 210 Wis. 2d 524, 536, 563
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28029 - 2007-02-08
of law that this court reviews de novo. Torgerson v. Journal/Sentinel, Inc., 210 Wis. 2d 524, 536, 563
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28029 - 2007-02-08
William Speener v. Donald Gudmanson
)(a)1. ¶9 Statutory construction presents a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15204 - 2005-03-31
)(a)1. ¶9 Statutory construction presents a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15204 - 2005-03-31
Rebecca S. Levine v. Pat Richter
of the common law doctrine of public officer immunity is a question of law which we review de novo. Kimps v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11551 - 2005-03-31
of the common law doctrine of public officer immunity is a question of law which we review de novo. Kimps v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11551 - 2005-03-31
State v. George R. Bollig
was knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently entered is question of constitutional fact, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14338 - 2005-03-31
was knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently entered is question of constitutional fact, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14338 - 2005-03-31
State v. Latosha Armstead
of law which this court reviews de novo. See State v. Post, 197 Wis.2d 279, 301, 541 N.W.2d 115, 121
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13160 - 2005-03-31
of law which this court reviews de novo. See State v. Post, 197 Wis.2d 279, 301, 541 N.W.2d 115, 121
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13160 - 2005-03-31
Deutsches Land, Inc. v. City of Glendale
the record de novo, applying the same standard and following the same methodology required of the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19038 - 2005-07-18
the record de novo, applying the same standard and following the same methodology required of the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19038 - 2005-07-18
[PDF]
State v. Erik Gracia
counsel’s performance was deficient and prejudiced the defendant are questions of law we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4710 - 2017-09-19
counsel’s performance was deficient and prejudiced the defendant are questions of law we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4710 - 2017-09-19