Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25161 - 25170 of 44407 for name change.
Search results 25161 - 25170 of 44407 for name change.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that the circuit court did not violate double jeopardy when it changed a sentence that it had imposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88488 - 2014-09-15
that the circuit court did not violate double jeopardy when it changed a sentence that it had imposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88488 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
not to be credible. Voigt’s assertion is accurate, but does not change our decision. The hearing officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30063 - 2014-09-15
not to be credible. Voigt’s assertion is accurate, but does not change our decision. The hearing officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30063 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Stacy L. Giraud v. Todd R. Giraud
for a substantial change in circumstances. See Anderson v. Anderson, 72 Wis.2d 631, 649, 242 N.W.2d 165, 174
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14318 - 2014-09-15
for a substantial change in circumstances. See Anderson v. Anderson, 72 Wis.2d 631, 649, 242 N.W.2d 165, 174
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14318 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Justin R. Loging
do not believe it would have changed the result at trial, in light of their generally consistent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6023 - 2017-09-19
do not believe it would have changed the result at trial, in light of their generally consistent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6023 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the mother and the children deserve to have a period of peace, and I’m going to not change my order
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=644968 - 2023-04-18
the mother and the children deserve to have a period of peace, and I’m going to not change my order
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=644968 - 2023-04-18
Rule Order
, however, a majority of the court was not persuaded there is a compelling need for the rule change because
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60740 - 2011-03-01
, however, a majority of the court was not persuaded there is a compelling need for the rule change because
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60740 - 2011-03-01
[PDF]
WI 100
presented the petition to the court. The petitioner agreed to certain changes suggested by the WDAA
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52680 - 2014-09-15
presented the petition to the court. The petitioner agreed to certain changes suggested by the WDAA
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52680 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI 25
conference, the court discussed the petition and voted (5–2) to approve the petition with certain changes
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186714 - 2017-09-21
conference, the court discussed the petition and voted (5–2) to approve the petition with certain changes
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186714 - 2017-09-21
Rule Order
, however, a majority of the court was not persuaded there is a compelling need for the rule change because
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60362 - 2011-03-01
, however, a majority of the court was not persuaded there is a compelling need for the rule change because
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60362 - 2011-03-01
William N. Ledford v. Nancy Turcotte
was pending, Ledford’s counsel moved for dismissal because a recent change in the open records statute meant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11324 - 2005-03-31
was pending, Ledford’s counsel moved for dismissal because a recent change in the open records statute meant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11324 - 2005-03-31