Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25171 - 25180 of 39147 for c's.
Search results 25171 - 25180 of 39147 for c's.
COURT OF APPEALS
and Shoreland Protection Ordinance Art. 10, § 9.99(C)(2) (2009), which terminates any legal preexisting use
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59994 - 2011-02-14
and Shoreland Protection Ordinance Art. 10, § 9.99(C)(2) (2009), which terminates any legal preexisting use
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59994 - 2011-02-14
COURT OF APPEALS
. and (c) (2009-10).[1] ¶3 The following exchange occurred at the plea hearing: Mr. Seymour
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74945 - 2011-12-13
. and (c) (2009-10).[1] ¶3 The following exchange occurred at the plea hearing: Mr. Seymour
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74945 - 2011-12-13
Diane M. Farris v. David C. Walhovd
. David C. Walhovd, Respondent-Appellant. APPEAL from a judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15995 - 2005-03-31
. David C. Walhovd, Respondent-Appellant. APPEAL from a judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15995 - 2005-03-31
Dane County Department of Human Services v. Antjuan E.
on the principle that “[c]ontemporaneous objection gives the trial court the opportunity to correct its own errors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4231 - 2013-09-16
on the principle that “[c]ontemporaneous objection gives the trial court the opportunity to correct its own errors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4231 - 2013-09-16
Ray A. Peterson v. Teresa E. Tucker
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Dane County: paul c. gartzke, Reserve Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15113 - 2005-03-31
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Dane County: paul c. gartzke, Reserve Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15113 - 2005-03-31
State v. John M. Ligon
. § 752.31(2)(c) (1999-2000). All references to the Wisconsin Statutes are to the 1999-2000 version unless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5008 - 2005-03-31
. § 752.31(2)(c) (1999-2000). All references to the Wisconsin Statutes are to the 1999-2000 version unless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5008 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
, 150 Wis. 2d 688, 703, 442 N.W.2d 514 (Ct. App. 1989) (“[C]ases should be decided on the narrowest
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112201 - 2005-03-31
, 150 Wis. 2d 688, 703, 442 N.W.2d 514 (Ct. App. 1989) (“[C]ases should be decided on the narrowest
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112201 - 2005-03-31
Roger L. Kaufman v. Jon E. Litscher
at Wis. Admin. Code § DOC 308.04(11)(c). The decision from which Kaufman appealed was dated February 6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4357 - 2010-07-27
at Wis. Admin. Code § DOC 308.04(11)(c). The decision from which Kaufman appealed was dated February 6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4357 - 2010-07-27
COURT OF APPEALS
. APPEAL and CROSS-APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Barron County: JAMES C
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28997 - 2007-05-14
. APPEAL and CROSS-APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Barron County: JAMES C
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28997 - 2007-05-14
State v. Michael S. Danforth
. § 908.08(3)(c), a child’s videotaped statement is admissible if, among other criteria, “the child’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7582 - 2005-03-31
. § 908.08(3)(c), a child’s videotaped statement is admissible if, among other criteria, “the child’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7582 - 2005-03-31