Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25171 - 25180 of 83322 for case search.
Search results 25171 - 25180 of 83322 for case search.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that Tiggs is not entitled to credit in this case for time served on sentences from Racine and Grant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81587 - 2014-09-15
that Tiggs is not entitled to credit in this case for time served on sentences from Racine and Grant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81587 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
his case first. We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 Poehnelt constructed five ponds on his property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71743 - 2011-10-03
his case first. We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 Poehnelt constructed five ponds on his property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71743 - 2011-10-03
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
asserted that at a sentencing hearing in Chippewa County Circuit Court case No. 2004-CF19, Judge Roderick
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212539 - 2018-05-08
asserted that at a sentencing hearing in Chippewa County Circuit Court case No. 2004-CF19, Judge Roderick
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212539 - 2018-05-08
[PDF]
NOTICE
of fact in this case as the next jury that may be called to determine such issues. You are not going
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34159 - 2014-09-15
of fact in this case as the next jury that may be called to determine such issues. You are not going
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34159 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
was not ineffective. Based upon our review of the briefs and Record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1010475 - 2025-09-17
was not ineffective. Based upon our review of the briefs and Record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1010475 - 2025-09-17
Ozaukee County Department of Social Services v. John D.
. § 48.24(5) to the facts of this case when it excluded evidence of prior incidents of abuse. We agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5206 - 2005-03-31
. § 48.24(5) to the facts of this case when it excluded evidence of prior incidents of abuse. We agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5206 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. § 809.21(1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=640653 - 2023-04-04
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. § 809.21(1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=640653 - 2023-04-04
[PDF]
WI App 2
2018 WI App 2 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2016AP924-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204961 - 2018-02-12
2018 WI App 2 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2016AP924-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204961 - 2018-02-12
State v. Steven E. Benash
was necessary for the State to prove its case, and permitted the State to reopen the hearing. The State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9448 - 2005-03-31
was necessary for the State to prove its case, and permitted the State to reopen the hearing. The State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9448 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Rayford N. Drake v. Linda F. Fikes
court2 stated that it was “not inclined to deny maintenance in this case, …, with this length
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10711 - 2017-09-20
court2 stated that it was “not inclined to deny maintenance in this case, …, with this length
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10711 - 2017-09-20