Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25181 - 25190 of 34033 for dismissal.
Search results 25181 - 25190 of 34033 for dismissal.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in exchange for the dismissal of the other charges, and the State agreed to recommend a sentence of four
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980460 - 2025-07-08
in exchange for the dismissal of the other charges, and the State agreed to recommend a sentence of four
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980460 - 2025-07-08
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
report is rejected and this appeal is dismissed without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=913151 - 2025-02-12
report is rejected and this appeal is dismissed without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=913151 - 2025-02-12
COURT OF APPEALS
an Alford[2] plea to the original charge, and the State agreed to move to dismiss and read in the companion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103595 - 2013-10-29
an Alford[2] plea to the original charge, and the State agreed to move to dismiss and read in the companion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103595 - 2013-10-29
[PDF]
WI App 164
that, in Saunders, the State submitted the repeater evidence “[i]mmediately after the jury had been dismissed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34178 - 2014-09-15
that, in Saunders, the State submitted the repeater evidence “[i]mmediately after the jury had been dismissed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34178 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of proof was not empaneled. The circuit court properly denied Judd’s motion to dismiss at the close
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=334581 - 2021-02-11
of proof was not empaneled. The circuit court properly denied Judd’s motion to dismiss at the close
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=334581 - 2021-02-11
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
in another case would be dismissed but read in for sentencing. Johnson pled guilty. The court rejected
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131671 - 2017-09-21
in another case would be dismissed but read in for sentencing. Johnson pled guilty. The court rejected
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131671 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
, P.J., Peterson and Brunner, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Jill Ardis appeals a summary judgment dismissing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50850 - 2014-09-15
, P.J., Peterson and Brunner, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Jill Ardis appeals a summary judgment dismissing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50850 - 2014-09-15
State v. Steven L. Harris
was dismissed in favor of allowing Harris to pursue an additional pro se Rule 809.30 postconviction motion. All
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20351 - 2005-11-22
was dismissed in favor of allowing Harris to pursue an additional pro se Rule 809.30 postconviction motion. All
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20351 - 2005-11-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
judgment in favor of the defendant Germantown Mutual Insurance Company, dismissing Birkholz’s claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101773 - 2017-09-21
judgment in favor of the defendant Germantown Mutual Insurance Company, dismissing Birkholz’s claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101773 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
dated September 6, 2018, that appeal, No. 2017AP1790, was dismissed pursuant to WIS. STAT. RULE 809.83
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=279288 - 2020-08-18
dated September 6, 2018, that appeal, No. 2017AP1790, was dismissed pursuant to WIS. STAT. RULE 809.83
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=279288 - 2020-08-18

