Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2521 - 2530 of 29823 for des.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
reviews de novo. Wagner Mobil, Inc. v. City of Madison, 190 Wis. 2d 585, 591, 527 N.W.2d 301 (1995
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88857 - 2014-09-15

State v. James Metz
ultimate findings on consent and voluntariness—is de novo. Phillips, 218 Wis.2d at 194–195, 577 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15259 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] 96 CV 1507 John Boughton v. Firstar Bank Wisconsin
to support the findings the trial court did make. Id. Appellants urge this court to adopt a de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13188 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI APP 68
that we review de novo. State v. Richardson, 156 Wis. 2d 128, 137–138, 456 N.W.2d 830, 833 (1990
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36095 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
of an unambiguous contract is a question of law that an appellate court reviews de novo. Town Bank v. City Real
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106463 - 2014-01-08

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
sentences comport with statutory requirements. This presents a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=125310 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. John W. Knoppe
presents a question of law that we decide de novo. See State v. Krier, 165 Wis.2d 673, 676, 478 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13304 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Marvin J. Theis v. Ford Motor Company
, and this appeal followed. ANALYSIS We review a summary judgment order de novo, and we adopt the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11755 - 2017-09-20

Laura K. Hanson v. Massachusetts Bay Insurance Company
de novo, applying the same standards as those employed by the trial court. Greene v. Gen. Cas. Co
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5971 - 2005-03-31

State v. Stanley Hess
this court reviews de novo. Id. at 283, 389 N.W.2d at 30. We will not upset a trial court’s findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10591 - 2005-03-31