Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2521 - 2530 of 29823 for des.

[PDF] Natalie Baker v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
. The third and lowest level of review provides that we will review the conclusions or interpretation de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11929 - 2017-09-21

State v. Antione Hunter
is an issue of law that we review de novo, State v. Sharp, 180 Wis. 2d 640, 649–650, 511 N.W.2d 316, 320–321
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4482 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Beverly Drews v. Carol Marwede
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25891 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of such discretion turns upon a question of law, however, we review the question de novo. Id. Here, the issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108494 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
erroneous. WIS. STAT. § 805.17(2). Questions of law we review de novo. Monicken, 226 Wis. 2d at 125
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35671 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Lisa K. Lepak v. Bryan D. Johnvin
of law his negligence was greater than Garrity's. When reviewing summary judgment, our review is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8656 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of counsel’s effectiveness is a question of law that is reviewed de novo by this court. Kimbrough, 246 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211869 - 2018-04-26

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
reviews de novo. Wagner Mobil, Inc. v. City of Madison, 190 Wis. 2d 585, 591, 527 N.W.2d 301 (1995
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88857 - 2014-09-15

State v. James Metz
ultimate findings on consent and voluntariness—is de novo. Phillips, 218 Wis.2d at 194–195, 577 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15259 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] 96 CV 1507 John Boughton v. Firstar Bank Wisconsin
to support the findings the trial court did make. Id. Appellants urge this court to adopt a de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13188 - 2017-09-21