Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2521 - 2530 of 81794 for order for a biological sample for drug testing.
Search results 2521 - 2530 of 81794 for order for a biological sample for drug testing.
State v. Renee A. Fredel
. Fredel did not ask for an alternative test. The blood sample taken from her on the morning of August 22
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9725 - 2005-03-31
. Fredel did not ask for an alternative test. The blood sample taken from her on the morning of August 22
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9725 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
City of Elkhorn v. The 211 Centralia Street Corporation
groundwater sampling reports and failing to use proper analytical methods for testing waste water. ¶11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6736 - 2017-09-20
groundwater sampling reports and failing to use proper analytical methods for testing waste water. ¶11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6736 - 2017-09-20
City of Elkhorn v. The 211 Centralia Street Corporation
had withheld testing results because “[s]ome of the grab samples they had taken were over the permit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6736 - 2005-03-31
had withheld testing results because “[s]ome of the grab samples they had taken were over the permit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6736 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
M.B., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. APPEALS from orders of the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=704165 - 2023-09-20
M.B., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. APPEALS from orders of the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=704165 - 2023-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
refusing to take a test for intoxication after arrest, contrary to Wis. Stat. § 343.305(10). He contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118797 - 2014-08-05
refusing to take a test for intoxication after arrest, contrary to Wis. Stat. § 343.305(10). He contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118797 - 2014-08-05
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, destroyed the sample pursuant to standard protocol. Id., ¶¶13, 16. Luedtke, who was unable to test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=355336 - 2021-04-14
, destroyed the sample pursuant to standard protocol. Id., ¶¶13, 16. Luedtke, who was unable to test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=355336 - 2021-04-14
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
or occasional drug tests” and reoffered AODA resources. ¶13 During the trial, the Department submitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=613402 - 2023-01-20
or occasional drug tests” and reoffered AODA resources. ¶13 During the trial, the Department submitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=613402 - 2023-01-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
test. ¶15 In the order denying the probable cause motion, the circuit court concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=808733 - 2024-06-05
test. ¶15 In the order denying the probable cause motion, the circuit court concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=808733 - 2024-06-05
[PDF]
assaults.2 Y.Z.’s biological parents were separated at that time and living in different residences
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=984177 - 2025-07-17
assaults.2 Y.Z.’s biological parents were separated at that time and living in different residences
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=984177 - 2025-07-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. APPEAL from an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92670 - 2014-09-15
COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. APPEAL from an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92670 - 2014-09-15