Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25201 - 25210 of 63360 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 25201 - 25210 of 63360 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
the complaint on the ground that these defendants were not timely served. In response to the motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95873 - 2014-09-15
the complaint on the ground that these defendants were not timely served. In response to the motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95873 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Caralynn then filed a motion for summary reversal, to which Brian did not file a response. Upon
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=632789 - 2023-03-16
. Caralynn then filed a motion for summary reversal, to which Brian did not file a response. Upon
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=632789 - 2023-03-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
). Miguel Muniz-Munoz, pro se, appeals the circuit court’s order denying his postconviction motion brought
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245495 - 2019-08-20
). Miguel Muniz-Munoz, pro se, appeals the circuit court’s order denying his postconviction motion brought
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245495 - 2019-08-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
postconviction motion for sentence modification. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=644968 - 2023-04-18
postconviction motion for sentence modification. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=644968 - 2023-04-18
[PDF]
State v. Steven J. Tobey
on May 10, 1995. The motion for postconviction relief was filed on May 22, 1995, alleging that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9220 - 2017-09-19
on May 10, 1995. The motion for postconviction relief was filed on May 22, 1995, alleging that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9220 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and as a repeater. He contends that the circuit court erred in denying his motion for a mistrial. Based upon our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=518129 - 2022-05-11
and as a repeater. He contends that the circuit court erred in denying his motion for a mistrial. Based upon our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=518129 - 2022-05-11
[PDF]
County of Dane v. John W. Moore
trial on the grounds that (1) the trial court improperly denied Moore’s motions to exclude evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5159 - 2017-09-19
trial on the grounds that (1) the trial court improperly denied Moore’s motions to exclude evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5159 - 2017-09-19
CA Blank Order
contends that the circuit court erred in denying his motion to compel the release of his victim’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96631 - 2013-05-06
contends that the circuit court erred in denying his motion to compel the release of his victim’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96631 - 2013-05-06
COURT OF APPEALS
PER CURIAM. Warren Slocum, pro se, appeals an order denying a motion to reopen his challenge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112631 - 2014-05-19
PER CURIAM. Warren Slocum, pro se, appeals an order denying a motion to reopen his challenge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112631 - 2014-05-19
State v. Thomas A. Freese
appeals from an order denying his motion to reconsider a prior order which had denied his motion to vacate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15004 - 2005-03-31
appeals from an order denying his motion to reconsider a prior order which had denied his motion to vacate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15004 - 2005-03-31