Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25201 - 25210 of 29823 for des.
Search results 25201 - 25210 of 29823 for des.
James Helnore v. Department of Natural Resources
a judgment on the pleadings. We review such a judgment de novo; it presents a question of law. Commercial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7349 - 2005-03-31
a judgment on the pleadings. We review such a judgment de novo; it presents a question of law. Commercial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7349 - 2005-03-31
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Arik J. Guenther
of fact are affirmed unless clearly erroneous; but conclusions of law are reviewed on a de novo basis
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19060 - 2005-07-18
of fact are affirmed unless clearly erroneous; but conclusions of law are reviewed on a de novo basis
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19060 - 2005-07-18
COURT OF APPEALS
We review summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52986 - 2010-08-04
We review summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52986 - 2010-08-04
COURT OF APPEALS
Our review of an alleged discovery violation presents questions of law, each of which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74024 - 2011-11-21
Our review of an alleged discovery violation presents questions of law, each of which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74024 - 2011-11-21
WI APP 121 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2012AP2294 Complete Title o...
we review de novo. Id. All doubts regarding whether a claim is frivolous “‘are resolved in favor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102007 - 2013-10-29
we review de novo. Id. All doubts regarding whether a claim is frivolous “‘are resolved in favor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102007 - 2013-10-29
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 14, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court o...
, which we decide de novo. See State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d 628, 634, 369 N.W.2d 711 (1985). When
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28389 - 2007-03-13
, which we decide de novo. See State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d 628, 634, 369 N.W.2d 711 (1985). When
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28389 - 2007-03-13
Steven Pertzsch v. Upper Oconomowoc Lake Association
. 1995). Although summary judgment presents a question of law which we review de novo, we nonetheless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3034 - 2005-03-31
. 1995). Although summary judgment presents a question of law which we review de novo, we nonetheless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3034 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
agencies.” DeLao, 252 Wis. 2d 289, ¶21. Statutory interpretation is a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=236349 - 2019-03-05
agencies.” DeLao, 252 Wis. 2d 289, ¶21. Statutory interpretation is a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=236349 - 2019-03-05
[PDF]
NOTICE
the sufficiency of a postconviction motion de novo, based on the four corners of the motion. Id., ¶¶9 and 27
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30340 - 2014-09-15
the sufficiency of a postconviction motion de novo, based on the four corners of the motion. Id., ¶¶9 and 27
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30340 - 2014-09-15
Frontsheet
findings of fact are affirmed unless clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105363 - 2013-12-09
findings of fact are affirmed unless clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105363 - 2013-12-09