Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25201 - 25210 of 33982 for dismissed.
Search results 25201 - 25210 of 33982 for dismissed.
State v. Nicholas J. Barbian
understand you’re charged in each of these counts as a habitual criminal? [Later, the trial court dismissed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18075 - 2005-05-09
understand you’re charged in each of these counts as a habitual criminal? [Later, the trial court dismissed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18075 - 2005-05-09
COURT OF APPEALS
to be dismissed. See Garfoot v. Fireman’s Fund Ins. Co., 228 Wis. 2d 707, 724, 599 N.W.2d 411 (Ct. App. 1999
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29206 - 2007-05-29
to be dismissed. See Garfoot v. Fireman’s Fund Ins. Co., 228 Wis. 2d 707, 724, 599 N.W.2d 411 (Ct. App. 1999
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29206 - 2007-05-29
Town of Wautoma v. City of Wautoma
., and Roggensack, J. EICH, C.J. The Town of Wautoma appeals from a judgment dismissing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12026 - 2005-03-31
., and Roggensack, J. EICH, C.J. The Town of Wautoma appeals from a judgment dismissing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12026 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Fourteen additional charges were dismissed and read in for sentencing purposes. The circuit court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=736205 - 2023-12-06
. Fourteen additional charges were dismissed and read in for sentencing purposes. The circuit court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=736205 - 2023-12-06
State v. Christina M. Goerlitz
court dismissing the State’s order to show cause why Christina M. Jacobson (formerly Goerlitz) should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15783 - 2005-03-31
court dismissing the State’s order to show cause why Christina M. Jacobson (formerly Goerlitz) should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15783 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
SC Clerk-Ltr
) Rule 6.02 (BA 6.02). Rule Petition dismissed. Referred to the BBE for review on March 8, 2018
/sc/statsan/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=227033 - 2018-11-09
) Rule 6.02 (BA 6.02). Rule Petition dismissed. Referred to the BBE for review on March 8, 2018
/sc/statsan/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=227033 - 2018-11-09
[PDF]
State v. Stanley Hess
recklessly endangering safety and, in response to the State’s motion, the trial court dismissed the penalty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10591 - 2017-09-20
recklessly endangering safety and, in response to the State’s motion, the trial court dismissed the penalty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10591 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Alan C. Campbell
filed a motion to dismiss the charges, but the court denied the motion. ¶3 At trial, Campbell
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3749 - 2017-09-19
filed a motion to dismiss the charges, but the court denied the motion. ¶3 At trial, Campbell
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3749 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to dismiss on the ground that Schnell failed to demonstrate in his motion that there were “reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=146650 - 2017-09-21
to dismiss on the ground that Schnell failed to demonstrate in his motion that there were “reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=146650 - 2017-09-21
State v. Gary Mahlum
, one for each handgun, in violation of § 943.20(1)(a), Stats.[2] Mahlum moved to dismiss all but one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14403 - 2005-03-31
, one for each handgun, in violation of § 943.20(1)(a), Stats.[2] Mahlum moved to dismiss all but one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14403 - 2005-03-31