Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25211 - 25220 of 58492 for speedy trial.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. J.T. entered a contest plea at that hearing, and a jury trial was scheduled for December 10, 2018
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=320232 - 2021-01-05

U.S. Bank National Association v. City of Milwaukee
to be unconstitutional. ¶2 The trial court granted the City’s motion to dismiss these consolidated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6279 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
] and the circuit court’s order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He contends his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32083 - 2008-03-12

State v. Dayna L. Lord
with the homicide charge and that such error was not harmless. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13522 - 2005-03-31

State v. Richard A. Imme
for postconviction relief based on a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. Imme contends that his trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18766 - 2005-06-28

Waushara County Department of Health and Family Services v. James B.
. ¶1 VERGERONT, J.[1] James B., the biological father of Tony B., appeals the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2248 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, 2019, the trial court held a hearing on the County’s petition for a yearlong extension of Lisa’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=301349 - 2020-11-04

Brown County Department of Health & Human Services v. Tammy L.W.
motions. She contends that the trial court erred because it failed to find that Tammy’s unfitness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3591 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Dayna L. Lord
and remand for a new trial on the first-degree homicide charge.1 On April 17, 1995, a solid waste
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13522 - 2017-09-21

State v. Fortune in Motion, Inc.
. Adm. Code § ATCP 122.01. At summary judgment, the trial court ruled that the Fortune in Motion plan
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11104 - 2005-03-31