Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25221 - 25230 of 40220 for financial disclosure statement.
Search results 25221 - 25230 of 40220 for financial disclosure statement.
[PDF]
Leroy Riesch v. David Schwarz
, 1998, to obtain a written or verbal statement from him concerning his case. The agent asked
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16776 - 2017-09-21
, 1998, to obtain a written or verbal statement from him concerning his case. The agent asked
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16776 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of Kupsky’s trial—a law enforcement officer who testified regarding Megan’s prior consistent statements
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=594965 - 2022-11-29
of Kupsky’s trial—a law enforcement officer who testified regarding Megan’s prior consistent statements
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=594965 - 2022-11-29
Matthew Tyler v. John Bett
statement.” Id. at ¶17. ¶12 Similarly, we concluded in State ex. rel. Locklear v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4504 - 2005-03-31
statement.” Id. at ¶17. ¶12 Similarly, we concluded in State ex. rel. Locklear v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4504 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 115
” in the agreement does not constitute such a clear statement; and he has given no reason to think that the right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33042 - 2014-09-15
” in the agreement does not constitute such a clear statement; and he has given no reason to think that the right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33042 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Marion Jones
with intent to deliver, as a party to a crime. Jones filed a motion to suppress her statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15022 - 2017-09-21
with intent to deliver, as a party to a crime. Jones filed a motion to suppress her statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15022 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that “[b]ecause these statements mirrored the statutory standard, they met the statutory standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=681996 - 2023-07-26
that “[b]ecause these statements mirrored the statutory standard, they met the statutory standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=681996 - 2023-07-26
[PDF]
State v. Calvin L. Collier
that the condition resulted from the victim’s previously admitted sexual encounter—an admission made in a statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12980 - 2017-09-21
that the condition resulted from the victim’s previously admitted sexual encounter—an admission made in a statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12980 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
the statements as a “disclaimer.” He also said both attorneys told him he was “in a good position” as a result
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30632 - 2007-10-15
the statements as a “disclaimer.” He also said both attorneys told him he was “in a good position” as a result
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30632 - 2007-10-15
Ernie Lessard v. Burnett County Board of Adjustment
Of Greeley v. Ells, 527 P.2d 538, 541-42 (Colo. 1974) (citation omitted). We agree that this statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4568 - 2005-03-31
Of Greeley v. Ells, 527 P.2d 538, 541-42 (Colo. 1974) (citation omitted). We agree that this statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4568 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
remembered a statement expressing a desire to harm someone. Trial counsel agreed it would not have hurt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194116 - 2017-09-21
remembered a statement expressing a desire to harm someone. Trial counsel agreed it would not have hurt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194116 - 2017-09-21