Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25231 - 25240 of 29740 for des.
Search results 25231 - 25240 of 29740 for des.
COURT OF APPEALS
571, 665 N.W.2d 305. However, we review de novo whether counsel’s performance was deficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94658 - 2013-03-27
571, 665 N.W.2d 305. However, we review de novo whether counsel’s performance was deficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94658 - 2013-03-27
[PDF]
John C. Koshick a/k/a Jack Koshick v. State
de novo. Brown v. State, 230 Wis. 2d 355, 363-64, 602 N.W.2d 79 (Ct. App. 1999). ¶8 The original
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19546 - 2017-09-21
de novo. Brown v. State, 230 Wis. 2d 355, 363-64, 602 N.W.2d 79 (Ct. App. 1999). ¶8 The original
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19546 - 2017-09-21
Susan K. Roemer v. Susan Riseling
of the common law doctrine of public officer immunity is a question of law which we review de novo. Kimps v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11559 - 2005-03-31
of the common law doctrine of public officer immunity is a question of law which we review de novo. Kimps v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11559 - 2005-03-31
State v. Barbara E. Harp
a question of statutory interpretation that we review de novo. State v. Brown, 2003 WI App 34, ¶12, 260 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20087 - 2005-12-11
a question of statutory interpretation that we review de novo. State v. Brown, 2003 WI App 34, ¶12, 260 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20087 - 2005-12-11
State v. James F. Brienzo
that we review de novo. See State v. Jensen, 2000 WI 84, ¶12, 236 Wis. 2d 521, 613 N.W.2d 170
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3986 - 2005-03-31
that we review de novo. See State v. Jensen, 2000 WI 84, ¶12, 236 Wis. 2d 521, 613 N.W.2d 170
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3986 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
). We review de novo the application of constitutional principles to the facts as found by the circuit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134279 - 2015-02-03
). We review de novo the application of constitutional principles to the facts as found by the circuit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134279 - 2015-02-03
COURT OF APPEALS
County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Reversed and cause remanded with directions. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58351 - 2010-12-27
County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Reversed and cause remanded with directions. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58351 - 2010-12-27
Dennis L. Jacobson v. American Tool Companies, Inc.
that we review de novo. See Ball v. District No. 4, Area Bd., 117 Wis.2d 529, 537, 345 N.W.2d 389, 394
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12824 - 2005-03-31
that we review de novo. See Ball v. District No. 4, Area Bd., 117 Wis.2d 529, 537, 345 N.W.2d 389, 394
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12824 - 2005-03-31
WI App 64 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2013AP265 Complete Title o...
).[4] A summary judgment motion presents a question of law that we review de novo. See Henry v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112663 - 2015-06-03
).[4] A summary judgment motion presents a question of law that we review de novo. See Henry v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112663 - 2015-06-03
State v. Robert A. Evans
. Id. at 637. We review de novo whether performance was deficient and prejudiced the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7046 - 2005-03-31
. Id. at 637. We review de novo whether performance was deficient and prejudiced the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7046 - 2005-03-31