Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25231 - 25240 of 58547 for speedy trial.
Search results 25231 - 25240 of 58547 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
appeals the order denying his postconviction motion, which sought a new trial or, in the alternative
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=468381 - 2021-12-29
appeals the order denying his postconviction motion, which sought a new trial or, in the alternative
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=468381 - 2021-12-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
have recused himself. Dolecki also contends that his trial attorney was constitutionally ineffective
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=524798 - 2022-05-24
have recused himself. Dolecki also contends that his trial attorney was constitutionally ineffective
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=524798 - 2022-05-24
U.S. Bank National Association v. City of Milwaukee
to be unconstitutional. ¶2 The trial court granted the City’s motion to dismiss these consolidated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6279 - 2005-03-31
to be unconstitutional. ¶2 The trial court granted the City’s motion to dismiss these consolidated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6279 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. J.T. entered a contest plea at that hearing, and a jury trial was scheduled for December 10, 2018
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=320232 - 2021-01-05
. J.T. entered a contest plea at that hearing, and a jury trial was scheduled for December 10, 2018
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=320232 - 2021-01-05
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
resulted in injuries to Julie. Julie filed this negligence action against Masbruch. At trial, the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=581957 - 2022-10-27
resulted in injuries to Julie. Julie filed this negligence action against Masbruch. At trial, the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=581957 - 2022-10-27
Wisconsin Seafood Company, Inc. v. David P. Fisher
by MPI’s employee, David Fisher. Seafood argues that the trial court erroneously interpreted the parties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5481 - 2005-03-31
by MPI’s employee, David Fisher. Seafood argues that the trial court erroneously interpreted the parties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5481 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
] and the circuit court’s order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He contends his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32083 - 2008-03-12
] and the circuit court’s order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He contends his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32083 - 2008-03-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
.3 ¶3 At the jury trial on the State’s WIS. STAT. ch. 980 petition, the State relied upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66108 - 2014-09-15
.3 ¶3 At the jury trial on the State’s WIS. STAT. ch. 980 petition, the State relied upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66108 - 2014-09-15
State v. Antonio M. Perkins
to § 940.225(3m).[1] He argues that the trial court erred by: (1) denying his motion to dismiss based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9062 - 2005-03-31
to § 940.225(3m).[1] He argues that the trial court erred by: (1) denying his motion to dismiss based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9062 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
discovered evidence entitles him to a new trial. For the reasons discussed below, we reject Jackson’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=586026 - 2022-11-08
discovered evidence entitles him to a new trial. For the reasons discussed below, we reject Jackson’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=586026 - 2022-11-08