Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25231 - 25240 of 58547 for speedy trial.
Search results 25231 - 25240 of 58547 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
.3 ¶3 At the jury trial on the State’s WIS. STAT. ch. 980 petition, the State relied upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66108 - 2014-09-15
.3 ¶3 At the jury trial on the State’s WIS. STAT. ch. 980 petition, the State relied upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66108 - 2014-09-15
U.S. Bank National Association v. City of Milwaukee
to be unconstitutional. ¶2 The trial court granted the City’s motion to dismiss these consolidated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6279 - 2005-03-31
to be unconstitutional. ¶2 The trial court granted the City’s motion to dismiss these consolidated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6279 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Antonio M. Perkins
argues that the trial court erred by: (1) denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9062 - 2017-09-19
argues that the trial court erred by: (1) denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9062 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
have recused himself. Dolecki also contends that his trial attorney was constitutionally ineffective
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=524798 - 2022-05-24
have recused himself. Dolecki also contends that his trial attorney was constitutionally ineffective
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=524798 - 2022-05-24
[PDF]
Wisconsin Seafood Company, Inc. v. David P. Fisher
agreement by MPI’s employee, David Fisher. Seafood argues that the trial court erroneously interpreted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5481 - 2017-09-19
agreement by MPI’s employee, David Fisher. Seafood argues that the trial court erroneously interpreted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5481 - 2017-09-19
Wisconsin Seafood Company, Inc. v. David P. Fisher
by MPI’s employee, David Fisher. Seafood argues that the trial court erroneously interpreted the parties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5481 - 2005-03-31
by MPI’s employee, David Fisher. Seafood argues that the trial court erroneously interpreted the parties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5481 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. J.T. entered a contest plea at that hearing, and a jury trial was scheduled for December 10, 2018
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=320232 - 2021-01-05
. J.T. entered a contest plea at that hearing, and a jury trial was scheduled for December 10, 2018
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=320232 - 2021-01-05
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
(Alpha Lambda).1 She argues that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment based on public
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79061 - 2014-09-15
(Alpha Lambda).1 She argues that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment based on public
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79061 - 2014-09-15
State v. Alonzo R.
that the trial court erred: (1) when it concluded that the percentage standards did not apply in setting past
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15128 - 2005-03-31
that the trial court erred: (1) when it concluded that the percentage standards did not apply in setting past
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15128 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Alonzo R.
The State claims that the trial court erred: (1) when it concluded that the percentage standards did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14802 - 2017-09-21
The State claims that the trial court erred: (1) when it concluded that the percentage standards did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14802 - 2017-09-21