Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25241 - 25250 of 59320 for SMALL CLAIMS.

State v. Stanley F. Toczynski
agree with the attorney general's contention that a challenge to the integrity of the officer's claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9125 - 2005-03-31

State v. Louis M. Elizondo, Jr.
of misdemeanor welfare fraud, in violation of § 49.12(1), Stats., 1991-92. He claims that his pleas were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12623 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] George M. DeBruin v. Town of Ashippun Board of Review
—for 1994. He objected to the assessment, claiming that it discriminated against residential property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11776 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. Kenneth L. Champion
, Champion, through his counsel, moved to sever the two sets of charges, claiming that a joint trial would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9641 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
appeals an order denying postconviction relief. Dean claims the circuit court No. 2014AP2142-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141396 - 2017-09-21

State v. Melinda Webber
the evidence at trial, and she is entitled to a Machner hearing on her ineffective assistance claim.[2] Lastly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12734 - 2005-03-31

State v. Alvin Braden
) and 961.573 (1999-2000).[1] He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion. Braden claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4731 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
. He also appeals an order denying postconviction relief. Dean claims the circuit court imposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141396 - 2015-05-11

State v. Kemmick D. Holmes
from a judgment of conviction and an order denying him postconviction relief. He claims that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15633 - 2005-03-31

Susan A. Riemer v. Universal Underwriters Insurance Company
from the umbrella, which Universal claims only covers Burnsville, its two owners and its employee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4886 - 2005-03-31