Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25241 - 25250 of 44408 for name change.
Search results 25241 - 25250 of 44408 for name change.
Order-SC
circumstances change (as they have several times over the past few weeks). For the reasons set forth, I do
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125237 - 2014-10-21
circumstances change (as they have several times over the past few weeks). For the reasons set forth, I do
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125237 - 2014-10-21
State v. Ralph Axelson
and his testimony at the revocation hearing. Except for a change in the prospective witness, now trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8296 - 2005-03-31
and his testimony at the revocation hearing. Except for a change in the prospective witness, now trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8296 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
. In both motions he sought to have his sentence changed from consecutive to concurrent. The first motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109404 - 2014-03-24
. In both motions he sought to have his sentence changed from consecutive to concurrent. The first motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109404 - 2014-03-24
Rule Order
, however, a majority of the court was not persuaded there is a compelling need for the rule change because
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60362 - 2011-03-01
, however, a majority of the court was not persuaded there is a compelling need for the rule change because
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60362 - 2011-03-01
CA Blank Order
not change based on administratively created divisions in larger counties. The record conclusively shows
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102475 - 2013-09-25
not change based on administratively created divisions in larger counties. The record conclusively shows
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102475 - 2013-09-25
William N. Ledford v. Nancy Turcotte
was pending, Ledford’s counsel moved for dismissal because a recent change in the open records statute meant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11324 - 2005-10-17
was pending, Ledford’s counsel moved for dismissal because a recent change in the open records statute meant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11324 - 2005-10-17
State v. Robert T. Langston
minor female, failing to provide the court with a notice of his change of address, and by committing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11318 - 2005-03-31
minor female, failing to provide the court with a notice of his change of address, and by committing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11318 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
and elements of the crime with which he was charged had changed; and (3) the trial court erroneously exercised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32209 - 2008-03-24
and elements of the crime with which he was charged had changed; and (3) the trial court erroneously exercised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32209 - 2008-03-24
[PDF]
January 25, 2013
of the case (case name); • a statement of the issue(s); • the date the Supreme Court accepted the case
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92208 - 2014-09-15
of the case (case name); • a statement of the issue(s); • the date the Supreme Court accepted the case
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92208 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
SC Table of Pending Cases - Added the recent decisions in 2010AP1366-CR and 2010AP3153
of the case (case name); • a statement of the issue(s); • the date the Supreme Court accepted the case
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92660 - 2014-09-15
of the case (case name); • a statement of the issue(s); • the date the Supreme Court accepted the case
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92660 - 2014-09-15