Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25241 - 25250 of 63981 for records/1000.
Search results 25241 - 25250 of 63981 for records/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS
. App. 1987). The circuit court’s orders here say: “For the reasons set forth on the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48709 - 2010-04-05
. App. 1987). The circuit court’s orders here say: “For the reasons set forth on the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48709 - 2010-04-05
Village of Westfield v. Christopher A. Becker
him in response to his open records request to the police chief. In answer to the court’s question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7664 - 2005-03-31
him in response to his open records request to the police chief. In answer to the court’s question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7664 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Bart E. Jenson
.2d 183 (Ct. App. 1984). We will affirm an exercise of sentencing discretion if the record shows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6382 - 2017-09-19
.2d 183 (Ct. App. 1984). We will affirm an exercise of sentencing discretion if the record shows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6382 - 2017-09-19
State v. Tomas C. Cuesta
, whether the trial court properly excluded evidence of the victim’s criminal record and whether he received
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4614 - 2005-03-31
, whether the trial court properly excluded evidence of the victim’s criminal record and whether he received
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4614 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
James L. Ard v. Patricia A. Ard
). When reviewing fact No. 2005AP2058 3 findings, we search the record for reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25724 - 2017-09-21
). When reviewing fact No. 2005AP2058 3 findings, we search the record for reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25724 - 2017-09-21
Frontsheet
in October 2004. The client gave copies of some of his medical records to Attorney Brandt. ¶8 In early
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71855 - 2011-10-04
in October 2004. The client gave copies of some of his medical records to Attorney Brandt. ¶8 In early
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71855 - 2011-10-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, and has filed a response. Upon our independent review of the record, as well as the no-merit report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=492500 - 2022-03-10
, and has filed a response. Upon our independent review of the record, as well as the no-merit report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=492500 - 2022-03-10
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107783 - 2017-09-21
the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107783 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
they represent a rational decision based on the application of the correct legal standards to the facts of record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90909 - 2012-12-20
they represent a rational decision based on the application of the correct legal standards to the facts of record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90909 - 2012-12-20
Racine County v. James P. G.
record, that the individual would be a proper subject for commitment if treatment were withdrawn.” See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19114 - 2005-07-26
record, that the individual would be a proper subject for commitment if treatment were withdrawn.” See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19114 - 2005-07-26