Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25251 - 25260 of 29985 for de.
Search results 25251 - 25260 of 29985 for de.
State v. Robert A. Evans
. Id. at 637. We review de novo whether performance was deficient and prejudiced the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7046 - 2005-03-31
. Id. at 637. We review de novo whether performance was deficient and prejudiced the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7046 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
review of an ineffective assistance of counsel claim, “‘[w]e review de novo the legal questions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208193 - 2018-02-13
review of an ineffective assistance of counsel claim, “‘[w]e review de novo the legal questions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208193 - 2018-02-13
[PDF]
Robert M. Hesslink, Jr. v. Jane A. Frederick
: ROBERT DE CHAMBEAU, Judge. Reversed and cause remanded with directions. Before Dykman, P.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12551 - 2017-09-21
: ROBERT DE CHAMBEAU, Judge. Reversed and cause remanded with directions. Before Dykman, P.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12551 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Denise Block v. Anthony Gomez
an issue of law, our review is de novo. See Old Republic Sur. Co. v. Erlien, 190 Wis.2d 400, 411, 527 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7850 - 2017-09-19
an issue of law, our review is de novo. See Old Republic Sur. Co. v. Erlien, 190 Wis.2d 400, 411, 527 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7850 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
—is a question of constitutional law” that we decide de novo. Id., ¶7 (citation omitted). Discussion ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26860 - 2014-09-15
—is a question of constitutional law” that we decide de novo. Id., ¶7 (citation omitted). Discussion ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26860 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
present questions of law that we review de novo. Bell v. Neugart, 2002 WI App 180, ¶15, 256 Wis. 2d 969
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=389871 - 2021-07-13
present questions of law that we review de novo. Bell v. Neugart, 2002 WI App 180, ¶15, 256 Wis. 2d 969
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=389871 - 2021-07-13
[PDF]
WI APP 117
materials in making this decision and, as such, the reviewing court applies a de novo standard of review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52163 - 2014-09-15
materials in making this decision and, as such, the reviewing court applies a de novo standard of review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52163 - 2014-09-15
2009 WI APP 164
of a statute, is a question of law, which is generally subject to de novo review. See id., ¶44. However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42781 - 2011-02-07
of a statute, is a question of law, which is generally subject to de novo review. See id., ¶44. However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42781 - 2011-02-07
[PDF]
WI APP 181
is a question of law, which we review de novo. Kimberly Area School Dist. v. LIRC, 2005 WI App 262, ¶9, 288
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29515 - 2014-09-15
is a question of law, which we review de novo. Kimberly Area School Dist. v. LIRC, 2005 WI App 262, ¶9, 288
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29515 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Claudia R. Cody v. Dane County
.” Duckworth v. Franzen, 780 F.2d 645, 652 (7th Cir. 1985). ¶11 We review summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2321 - 2017-09-19
.” Duckworth v. Franzen, 780 F.2d 645, 652 (7th Cir. 1985). ¶11 We review summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2321 - 2017-09-19