Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25251 - 25260 of 29823 for des.
Search results 25251 - 25260 of 29823 for des.
State v. Daniel C. Tuescher
. App. 1996). This involves a question of law subject to de novo review. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14459 - 2005-03-31
. App. 1996). This involves a question of law subject to de novo review. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14459 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Gerald Gielow v. Thaddeus F. G. Napiorkowski
de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court. Miller ex rel. Fehring v. Wausau
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6032 - 2017-09-19
de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court. Miller ex rel. Fehring v. Wausau
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6032 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI App 50
, 84, 382 Wis. 2d 496, 914 N.W.2d 21. Accordingly, we review the Commission’s legal conclusions de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245605 - 2019-10-04
, 84, 382 Wis. 2d 496, 914 N.W.2d 21. Accordingly, we review the Commission’s legal conclusions de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245605 - 2019-10-04
[PDF]
State v. Robert V. Horn
reviews de novo. State v. Borrell, 167 Wis. 2d 749, 762, 482 N.W.2d 883 (1992). ¶8 When a party
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17307 - 2017-09-21
reviews de novo. State v. Borrell, 167 Wis. 2d 749, 762, 482 N.W.2d 883 (1992). ¶8 When a party
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17307 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
review of an ineffective assistance of counsel claim, “‘[w]e review de novo the legal questions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208193 - 2018-02-13
review of an ineffective assistance of counsel claim, “‘[w]e review de novo the legal questions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208193 - 2018-02-13
[PDF]
Federal Insurance Company v. Grunau Project Development, Inc.
as they are all interrelated. ¶13 The standard of review of a motion granting summary judgment is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25384 - 2017-09-21
as they are all interrelated. ¶13 The standard of review of a motion granting summary judgment is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25384 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. This is a question of law subject to de novo review. See id., ¶9. “If the motion raises such facts, the [trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=137005 - 2017-09-21
. This is a question of law subject to de novo review. See id., ¶9. “If the motion raises such facts, the [trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=137005 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 32
by Deadwiller), aff’d, 2013 WI 75, 350 Wis. 2d 138, 834 N.W.2d 362. 2 We review de novo the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106992 - 2017-09-21
by Deadwiller), aff’d, 2013 WI 75, 350 Wis. 2d 138, 834 N.W.2d 362. 2 We review de novo the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106992 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Sylvester J. Sasnett, Jr.
to raise a question of fact necessitating a Machner hearing. This review is de novo. State v. Toliver
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8326 - 2017-09-19
to raise a question of fact necessitating a Machner hearing. This review is de novo. State v. Toliver
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8326 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Robert A. Evans
professional judgment. Id. at 637. We review de novo whether performance was deficient and prejudiced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7046 - 2017-09-20
professional judgment. Id. at 637. We review de novo whether performance was deficient and prejudiced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7046 - 2017-09-20