Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25251 - 25260 of 64013 for records/1000.
Search results 25251 - 25260 of 64013 for records/1000.
[PDF]
State v. Bart E. Jenson
.2d 183 (Ct. App. 1984). We will affirm an exercise of sentencing discretion if the record shows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6382 - 2017-09-19
.2d 183 (Ct. App. 1984). We will affirm an exercise of sentencing discretion if the record shows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6382 - 2017-09-19
State v. Tomas C. Cuesta
, whether the trial court properly excluded evidence of the victim’s criminal record and whether he received
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4614 - 2005-03-31
, whether the trial court properly excluded evidence of the victim’s criminal record and whether he received
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4614 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
James L. Ard v. Patricia A. Ard
). When reviewing fact No. 2005AP2058 3 findings, we search the record for reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25724 - 2017-09-21
). When reviewing fact No. 2005AP2058 3 findings, we search the record for reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25724 - 2017-09-21
Frontsheet
in October 2004. The client gave copies of some of his medical records to Attorney Brandt. ¶8 In early
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71855 - 2011-10-04
in October 2004. The client gave copies of some of his medical records to Attorney Brandt. ¶8 In early
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71855 - 2011-10-04
[PDF]
State v. Timothy R. Ragner
stated, without further explanation: “Judge, for the record, I would like to object on behalf
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15860 - 2017-09-21
stated, without further explanation: “Judge, for the record, I would like to object on behalf
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15860 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93166 - 2013-02-25
our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93166 - 2013-02-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and an independent review of the record, we conclude that the 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123440 - 2017-09-21
and an independent review of the record, we conclude that the 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123440 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
sentencing discretion, a circuit court is to specify, on the record, the sentencing objectives it deems
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40992 - 2009-09-21
sentencing discretion, a circuit court is to specify, on the record, the sentencing objectives it deems
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40992 - 2009-09-21
Dana J. Stadler v. Linda M. Stadler
’ property. Because the record supports the trial court’s discretion, we affirm the judgment. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6354 - 2005-03-31
’ property. Because the record supports the trial court’s discretion, we affirm the judgment. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6354 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=581349 - 2022-10-25
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=581349 - 2022-10-25