Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25251 - 25260 of 58547 for speedy trial.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
to evict Meixensperger. A bench trial was scheduled for May 24, 2019. Prior to the start of trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=288451 - 2020-09-16

[PDF] Brown County Department of Health & Human Services v. Tammy L.W.
contends that the trial court erred because it failed to find that Tammy’s unfitness as a parent was so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3590 - 2017-09-19

State v. Wesley Michael Lund
the influence of an intoxicant (OMVWI). The trial court suppressed the evidence after concluding that (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7335 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Wesley Michael Lund
2 operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicant (OMVWI). The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7335 - 2017-09-20

State v. Alonzo R.
that the trial court erred: (1) when it concluded that the percentage standards did not apply in setting past
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14802 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Waushara County Department of Health and Family Services v. James B.
B., the biological father of Tony B., appeals the trial court’s dispositional order terminating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2248 - 2017-09-19

State v. Timothy J. Johnson
relief. Johnson argues the trial court had no statutory authority to order consecutive periods
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19295 - 2005-09-19

[PDF] Harvey F. Jacque v. Steenberg Homes, Inc.
anyway. In the later trespass action, however, the trial court found that Harvey and his wife, Lois C
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8909 - 2017-09-19

State v. Fortune in Motion, Inc.
. Adm. Code § ATCP 122.01. At summary judgment, the trial court ruled that the Fortune in Motion plan
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11104 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Timothy J. Johnson
2004AP3031-CR 2 argues the trial court had no statutory authority to order consecutive periods
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19295 - 2017-09-21