Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25261 - 25270 of 59266 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 25261 - 25270 of 59266 for SMALL CLAIMS.
[PDF]
Bernard R. Lyon v. Renee G. Hilgers
for the value of income tax exemptions claimed by Hilgers. We reject Lyon’s arguments and affirm the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16263 - 2017-09-21
for the value of income tax exemptions claimed by Hilgers. We reject Lyon’s arguments and affirm the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16263 - 2017-09-21
State v. Louis M. Elizondo, Jr.
of misdemeanor welfare fraud, in violation of § 49.12(1), Stats., 1991-92. He claims that his pleas were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12623 - 2005-03-31
of misdemeanor welfare fraud, in violation of § 49.12(1), Stats., 1991-92. He claims that his pleas were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12623 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
MBNA America Bank v. Gary Gilbertson
an arbitration claim against David and his brother, Gary Gilbertson, in February 2002, seeking arbitration
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18088 - 2017-09-21
an arbitration claim against David and his brother, Gary Gilbertson, in February 2002, seeking arbitration
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18088 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
motion for plea withdrawal. He claims he is No. 2010AP186-CR 2 entitled to an evidentiary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55527 - 2014-09-15
motion for plea withdrawal. He claims he is No. 2010AP186-CR 2 entitled to an evidentiary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55527 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
claim. II. The State’s Compliance with the IAD ¶24 The IAD is “a congressionally approved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=877939 - 2024-11-19
claim. II. The State’s Compliance with the IAD ¶24 The IAD is “a congressionally approved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=877939 - 2024-11-19
COURT OF APPEALS
of trial counsel. We affirm. ¶2 To prove a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, a defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50289 - 2010-05-24
of trial counsel. We affirm. ¶2 To prove a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, a defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50289 - 2010-05-24
State v. Karshra C. Armstrong
the prosecutor's closing argument commented on his failure to testify. We reject his claims and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10023 - 2005-03-31
the prosecutor's closing argument commented on his failure to testify. We reject his claims and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10023 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
report, claiming his trial attorney was ineffective, and also challenging the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170585 - 2017-09-21
report, claiming his trial attorney was ineffective, and also challenging the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170585 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
children both claimed a right to the proceeds of Mary’s life insurance policy. ¶6 David and Adam
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110388 - 2014-04-16
children both claimed a right to the proceeds of Mary’s life insurance policy. ¶6 David and Adam
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110388 - 2014-04-16
[PDF]
George M. DeBruin v. Town of Ashippun Board of Review
—for 1994. He objected to the assessment, claiming that it discriminated against residential property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11776 - 2017-09-20
—for 1994. He objected to the assessment, claiming that it discriminated against residential property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11776 - 2017-09-20