Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25261 - 25270 of 83001 for case codes/1000.
Search results 25261 - 25270 of 83001 for case codes/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=840528 - 2024-08-21
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=840528 - 2024-08-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
in” at sentencing. In 2007, Griffin sought sentence credit, which was denied because the sentence on that case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33274 - 2014-09-15
in” at sentencing. In 2007, Griffin sought sentence credit, which was denied because the sentence on that case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33274 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
and Record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1033258 - 2025-11-05
and Record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1033258 - 2025-11-05
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of her right to file a response. Dahl has not responded. We conclude that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1063218 - 2026-01-15
of her right to file a response. Dahl has not responded. We conclude that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1063218 - 2026-01-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
forth a prima facie case warranting an evidentiary hearing. In State v. Clark, 2022 WI 21, 401 Wis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=542307 - 2022-07-08
forth a prima facie case warranting an evidentiary hearing. In State v. Clark, 2022 WI 21, 401 Wis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=542307 - 2022-07-08
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
and Record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1033258 - 2025-11-05
and Record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1033258 - 2025-11-05
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
denying him relief from a restitution order entered in this case in 1991. No. 2016AP1159-CR 2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194036 - 2017-09-21
denying him relief from a restitution order entered in this case in 1991. No. 2016AP1159-CR 2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194036 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Diane Marie Conniff v. Richard Seth McCaleb
case, which we discuss below. Therefore, any error was harmless. ¶4 Conniff also argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7030 - 2017-09-20
case, which we discuss below. Therefore, any error was harmless. ¶4 Conniff also argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7030 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
County of Milwaukee v. Galila Telele
response is just that I do feel that Deputy Pauley is essential to my case. He will be the first officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4376 - 2017-09-19
response is just that I do feel that Deputy Pauley is essential to my case. He will be the first officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4376 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
-CR 2 case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2011-12). 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103978 - 2017-09-21
-CR 2 case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2011-12). 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103978 - 2017-09-21