Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25261 - 25270 of 57351 for id.
Search results 25261 - 25270 of 57351 for id.
Mary Ann Wendt v. Clifford Wendt
of whether the change is substantial is a question of law we review independently. Id. ¶10 Although
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5796 - 2005-03-31
of whether the change is substantial is a question of law we review independently. Id. ¶10 Although
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5796 - 2005-03-31
Chambers & Owen, Inc. v. Steven Fox
language is ambiguous only when it is reasonably susceptible of more than one construction. Id at 193, 499
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14103 - 2005-03-31
language is ambiguous only when it is reasonably susceptible of more than one construction. Id at 193, 499
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14103 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the protection of the public health, safety or general welfare.’” Id., ¶8 (alteration in original; quoted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=804982 - 2024-05-23
the protection of the public health, safety or general welfare.’” Id., ¶8 (alteration in original; quoted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=804982 - 2024-05-23
COURT OF APPEALS
that a traffic violation has been or will be committed. Id. When we review a motion to suppress evidence, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29577 - 2007-07-04
that a traffic violation has been or will be committed. Id. When we review a motion to suppress evidence, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29577 - 2007-07-04
[PDF]
State v. James F. Neil
-1137 (D.C. Cir. 1972) (but court should not so instruct jury). Id. at 630, 468 N.W.2d at 734-35
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15187 - 2017-09-21
-1137 (D.C. Cir. 1972) (but court should not so instruct jury). Id. at 630, 468 N.W.2d at 734-35
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15187 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Donald M. Petersilka
of statutory interpretation is to discern the intent of the legislature. See id. To do so, we first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15700 - 2017-09-21
of statutory interpretation is to discern the intent of the legislature. See id. To do so, we first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15700 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
constitute a manifest injustice. Id., ¶17. The issue before this court is whether the plea should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=182001 - 2017-09-21
constitute a manifest injustice. Id., ¶17. The issue before this court is whether the plea should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=182001 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the defendant’s guilt. Id. No. 2014AP1606 3 “[W]hen the newly discovered evidence is a witness’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=153838 - 2017-09-21
the defendant’s guilt. Id. No. 2014AP1606 3 “[W]hen the newly discovered evidence is a witness’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=153838 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
is appropriate “when it is necessary to completely re-do [an] invalid sentence.” Id. No. 2019AP77-CR
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252448 - 2020-01-15
is appropriate “when it is necessary to completely re-do [an] invalid sentence.” Id. No. 2019AP77-CR
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252448 - 2020-01-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and the credibility of the witnesses and resolves any conflicts in the testimony. See id. at 503-04. We agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=717027 - 2023-10-17
and the credibility of the witnesses and resolves any conflicts in the testimony. See id. at 503-04. We agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=717027 - 2023-10-17