Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25271 - 25280 of 83001 for case codes/1000.
Search results 25271 - 25280 of 83001 for case codes/1000.
State v. Lamont Williams
retroactively to his case, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 On December 16, 1993, Williams
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7630 - 2005-03-31
retroactively to his case, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 On December 16, 1993, Williams
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7630 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
in” at sentencing. In 2007, Griffin sought sentence credit, which was denied because the sentence on that case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33274 - 2014-09-15
in” at sentencing. In 2007, Griffin sought sentence credit, which was denied because the sentence on that case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33274 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
relied on the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, as well as a case from the District of Columbia Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60262 - 2011-02-22
relied on the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, as well as a case from the District of Columbia Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60262 - 2011-02-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
involving victim A.M. Two months later, Santiago was charged in a separate case with one count of first
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=584861 - 2022-11-01
involving victim A.M. Two months later, Santiago was charged in a separate case with one count of first
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=584861 - 2022-11-01
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
denying him relief from a restitution order entered in this case in 1991. No. 2016AP1159-CR 2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194036 - 2017-09-21
denying him relief from a restitution order entered in this case in 1991. No. 2016AP1159-CR 2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194036 - 2017-09-21
County of Milwaukee v. Galila Telele
to my case. He will be the first officer testifying and subject to me calling him on rebuttal, which I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4376 - 2005-03-31
to my case. He will be the first officer testifying and subject to me calling him on rebuttal, which I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4376 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Diane Marie Conniff v. Richard Seth McCaleb
case, which we discuss below. Therefore, any error was harmless. ¶4 Conniff also argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7030 - 2017-09-20
case, which we discuss below. Therefore, any error was harmless. ¶4 Conniff also argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7030 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=840528 - 2024-08-21
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=840528 - 2024-08-21
COURT OF APPEALS
from the trial transcript in this case. Before trial, the court granted a motion to exclude evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49214 - 2010-04-21
from the trial transcript in this case. Before trial, the court granted a motion to exclude evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49214 - 2010-04-21
Diane Marie Conniff v. Richard Seth McCaleb
have helped solve the problem that ultimately leads to dismissal of Conniff’s case, which we discuss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7030 - 2005-03-31
have helped solve the problem that ultimately leads to dismissal of Conniff’s case, which we discuss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7030 - 2005-03-31