Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25271 - 25280 of 77035 for judgment for u s.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
to outpatient status. On March 9, 2018, Milwaukee County filed a motion to extend E.C.H.’s original
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252355 - 2020-01-14

[PDF] State v. Eugene G.
. This motion was not granted because no backlog exists of one-judge cases in this district. Eugene G.’s case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6692 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
have revoked or significantly curtailed the POAs that named as agents two other of E.T.’s adult
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185389 - 2017-09-21

La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Debra J.A.
DISTRICT IV No. 00-0233 In re the Termination of Parental Rights to Brittany S., a Person Under the Age
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2190 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Debra J.A.
OF APPEALS DISTRICT IV NO. 00-0233 IN RE THE TERMINATION OF PARENTAL RIGHTS TO BRITTANY S
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2189 - 2017-09-19

State v. Eugene G.
.’s seventeenth birthday; and (2) extend the revised order for one year. The reason given
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6692 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
). Accordingly, I affirm the orders of the circuit court. BACKGROUND ¶2 On December 11, 2023, T.R.B.’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1059437 - 2026-01-08

Dane County Department of Human Services v. Frederick L. E.
placements. ¶5 Our standard of review was explained in David S. v. Laura S., 179 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15876 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Dane County Department of Human Services v. Frederick L. E.
placements and the results of prior placements. ¶5 Our standard of review was explained in David S. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15877 - 2017-09-21

Dane County Department of Human Services v. Frederick L. E.
placements. ¶5 Our standard of review was explained in David S. v. Laura S., 179 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15877 - 2005-03-31