Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25291 - 25300 of 64743 for b's.
Search results 25291 - 25300 of 64743 for b's.
[PDF]
State v. Charles Jasper, Jr.
correctly determined that Jasper’s lawyer provided effective assistance. B. New Factor/Sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2440 - 2017-09-19
correctly determined that Jasper’s lawyer provided effective assistance. B. New Factor/Sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2440 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
at sentencing. WISCONSIN STAT. § 973.20(1g)(b) (2005-06),5 defines a read-in charge as [a]ny crime
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32995 - 2014-09-15
at sentencing. WISCONSIN STAT. § 973.20(1g)(b) (2005-06),5 defines a read-in charge as [a]ny crime
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32995 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Oak Hill Development Corporation v. Board of Review for the City of Oak Creek
showing it to be incorrect.”) (citation omitted). B. Discussion Oak Hills claims that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12671 - 2017-09-21
showing it to be incorrect.”) (citation omitted). B. Discussion Oak Hills claims that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12671 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
enticement, the now-codified greater latitude rule applies. WIS. STAT. § 904.04(2)(b)1. By making
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=815692 - 2024-06-25
enticement, the now-codified greater latitude rule applies. WIS. STAT. § 904.04(2)(b)1. By making
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=815692 - 2024-06-25
[PDF]
WI App 53
administrative district.” SCR 70.19(3)(a)-(b); see also SCR ch. 70, Judicial Council Committee’s Note
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215198 - 2018-11-09
administrative district.” SCR 70.19(3)(a)-(b); see also SCR ch. 70, Judicial Council Committee’s Note
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215198 - 2018-11-09
[PDF]
State v. Roger L. Stank
the trial court’s determination after an in camera review under § 905.10(3)(b), we determine whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4442 - 2017-09-19
the trial court’s determination after an in camera review under § 905.10(3)(b), we determine whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4442 - 2017-09-19
State v. Gregory A. Miller
permanent disfigurement, or (3) which caused: a) a permanent or protracted loss, or b) impairment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11991 - 2005-03-31
permanent disfigurement, or (3) which caused: a) a permanent or protracted loss, or b) impairment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11991 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Lawrence Williams
and that the statements he gave were voluntary. B. Dismissal of the thirteenth juror. The selection of jurors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12432 - 2017-09-21
and that the statements he gave were voluntary. B. Dismissal of the thirteenth juror. The selection of jurors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12432 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
robbery as a party to the crime and as a habitual criminal, in violation of WIS. STAT. §§ 943.32(1)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28982 - 2014-09-15
robbery as a party to the crime and as a habitual criminal, in violation of WIS. STAT. §§ 943.32(1)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28982 - 2014-09-15
2009 WI APP 40
. Stat. § 102.18(1)(b) authorizes post-hearing award modifications due to a change in the employee’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35480 - 2009-03-24
. Stat. § 102.18(1)(b) authorizes post-hearing award modifications due to a change in the employee’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35480 - 2009-03-24