Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25291 - 25300 of 57152 for id.
Search results 25291 - 25300 of 57152 for id.
COURT OF APPEALS
an investigative stop, is less than the level of proof required to establish probable cause for arrest. Id. at 314
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26661 - 2006-10-03
an investigative stop, is less than the level of proof required to establish probable cause for arrest. Id. at 314
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26661 - 2006-10-03
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
subject to independent review. Id. On review, we view the jury instructions as a whole, and grant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90570 - 2014-09-15
subject to independent review. Id. On review, we view the jury instructions as a whole, and grant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90570 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
is appropriate “when it is necessary to completely re-do [an] invalid sentence.” Id. No. 2019AP77-CR
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252448 - 2020-01-15
is appropriate “when it is necessary to completely re-do [an] invalid sentence.” Id. No. 2019AP77-CR
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252448 - 2020-01-15
COURT OF APPEALS
preponderance of the evidence. Id., ¶12. Under this standard, we do not set aside a finding of fact even
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90587 - 2012-12-12
preponderance of the evidence. Id., ¶12. Under this standard, we do not set aside a finding of fact even
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90587 - 2012-12-12
Dennis Kocken v. Wisconsin Council 40 AFSCME
at common law.” Id. Immemorial, principal and important duties of the sheriff at common law
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26231 - 2006-08-14
at common law.” Id. Immemorial, principal and important duties of the sheriff at common law
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26231 - 2006-08-14
[PDF]
NOTICE
, we apply the law to those facts without deference to the trial court. Id. ¶6 “Where the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33777 - 2014-09-15
, we apply the law to those facts without deference to the trial court. Id. ¶6 “Where the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33777 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
, intelligently, and voluntarily waive his or her right to counsel.” Id., ¶25. If the defendant makes a prima
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35761 - 2014-09-15
, intelligently, and voluntarily waive his or her right to counsel.” Id., ¶25. If the defendant makes a prima
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35761 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
).[1] However, it is admissible when offered for other purposes. Id. Here, the court instructed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34499 - 2008-11-03
).[1] However, it is admissible when offered for other purposes. Id. Here, the court instructed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34499 - 2008-11-03
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
erroneous, but whether those facts pass constitutional muster is a question of law we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213537 - 2018-05-30
erroneous, but whether those facts pass constitutional muster is a question of law we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213537 - 2018-05-30
COURT OF APPEALS
of the defendant’s motion by examining the four corners of the postconviction motion. Id. When the defendant has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112186 - 2014-05-12
of the defendant’s motion by examining the four corners of the postconviction motion. Id. When the defendant has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112186 - 2014-05-12