Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25291 - 25300 of 63981 for records/1000.
Search results 25291 - 25300 of 63981 for records/1000.
[PDF]
State v. Timothy R. Ragner
stated, without further explanation: “Judge, for the record, I would like to object on behalf
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15860 - 2017-09-21
stated, without further explanation: “Judge, for the record, I would like to object on behalf
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15860 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Michael L. Payne v. Judith A. Payne
interfered with his ability to participate in the trial. The record does not support that argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13480 - 2017-09-21
interfered with his ability to participate in the trial. The record does not support that argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13480 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
change. Based upon our review of his brief and the record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237565 - 2019-03-20
change. Based upon our review of his brief and the record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237565 - 2019-03-20
COURT OF APPEALS
our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93166 - 2013-02-25
our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93166 - 2013-02-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we summarily affirm the judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244100 - 2019-07-24
, and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we summarily affirm the judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244100 - 2019-07-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of obstructing an officer related to his interaction with officers on April 28, 2012. The record indicates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107360 - 2017-09-21
of obstructing an officer related to his interaction with officers on April 28, 2012. The record indicates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107360 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
). The circuit court’s orders here say: “For the reasons set forth on the record of the March 18, 2009
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48709 - 2014-09-15
). The circuit court’s orders here say: “For the reasons set forth on the record of the March 18, 2009
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48709 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and an independent review of the record, we conclude that the 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123440 - 2017-09-21
and an independent review of the record, we conclude that the 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123440 - 2017-09-21
State v. Robert Feiner
At the time of sentencing, Feiner was sixty years old. He had no criminal record. Feiner’s admitted sexual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6231 - 2005-03-31
At the time of sentencing, Feiner was sixty years old. He had no criminal record. Feiner’s admitted sexual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6231 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
sentencing discretion, a circuit court is to specify, on the record, the sentencing objectives it deems
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40992 - 2009-09-21
sentencing discretion, a circuit court is to specify, on the record, the sentencing objectives it deems
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40992 - 2009-09-21