Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2531 - 2540 of 17244 for probate/1000.
Search results 2531 - 2540 of 17244 for probate/1000.
State v. Nicholas S. Radtke
that statements made to a parole or probation officer are inadmissible on subsequent related charges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13747 - 2005-03-31
that statements made to a parole or probation officer are inadmissible on subsequent related charges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13747 - 2005-03-31
State v. Cheryl A. Koenig
. The trial court withheld sentencing and placed Koenig on three years of probation.[2] Koenig’s probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5183 - 2005-03-31
. The trial court withheld sentencing and placed Koenig on three years of probation.[2] Koenig’s probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5183 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Cheryl A. Koenig
Koenig on three years of probation.2 Koenig’s probation was revoked on October 12, 2001
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5183 - 2017-09-19
Koenig on three years of probation.2 Koenig’s probation was revoked on October 12, 2001
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5183 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Nicholas S. Radtke
to a parole or probation officer are inadmissible on subsequent related charges. Specifically, he argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13747 - 2014-09-15
to a parole or probation officer are inadmissible on subsequent related charges. Specifically, he argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13747 - 2014-09-15
State v. James E. Gray
the conditions of his probation to include a one-year jail term. We conclude that Gray has partially waived his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11741 - 2005-03-31
the conditions of his probation to include a one-year jail term. We conclude that Gray has partially waived his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11741 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. James E. Gray
the conditions of his probation to include a one-year jail term. We conclude that Gray has partially waived
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11741 - 2014-09-15
the conditions of his probation to include a one-year jail term. We conclude that Gray has partially waived
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11741 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
court order affirming the revocation of his probation on certiorari review. Based upon our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=622140 - 2023-02-15
court order affirming the revocation of his probation on certiorari review. Based upon our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=622140 - 2023-02-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
agreed to recommend probation with no more than six months in jail as a condition. ¶5 At sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30467 - 2014-09-15
agreed to recommend probation with no more than six months in jail as a condition. ¶5 At sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30467 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a Division of Hearings and Appeals No. 2019AP489 2 (DHA) decision to revoke Risch’s probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=333095 - 2021-02-09
a Division of Hearings and Appeals No. 2019AP489 2 (DHA) decision to revoke Risch’s probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=333095 - 2021-02-09
COURT OF APPEALS
no contest plea, the State agreed to recommend probation with no more than six months in jail as a condition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30467 - 2007-10-01
no contest plea, the State agreed to recommend probation with no more than six months in jail as a condition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30467 - 2007-10-01