Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2531 - 2540 of 58492 for speedy trial.
Search results 2531 - 2540 of 58492 for speedy trial.
COURT OF APPEALS
is entitled to a new trial on two grounds: (1) his constitutional right to a fair trial was violated because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75598 - 2011-12-21
is entitled to a new trial on two grounds: (1) his constitutional right to a fair trial was violated because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75598 - 2011-12-21
Patti Jo Hendricks v. Gregory A. Thieme
the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by rejecting his request for an adjournment without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21213 - 2006-02-06
the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by rejecting his request for an adjournment without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21213 - 2006-02-06
[PDF]
Patti Jo Hendricks v. Gregory A. Thieme
a portion of Hendricks’ attorney fees for “over-litigating.” Thieme also claims the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21213 - 2017-09-21
a portion of Hendricks’ attorney fees for “over-litigating.” Thieme also claims the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21213 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
postconviction motion. The sole issue is whether the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47707 - 2014-09-15
postconviction motion. The sole issue is whether the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47707 - 2014-09-15
State v. Joseph A. Diaz
denying his postconviction motion seeking sentence modification. Diaz claims that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20086 - 2007-06-04
denying his postconviction motion seeking sentence modification. Diaz claims that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20086 - 2007-06-04
COURT OF APPEALS
issue is whether the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47707 - 2010-03-08
issue is whether the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47707 - 2010-03-08
State v. Jamie R. Miller
motion for a new trial. On appeal, he challenges the trial court’s refusal to conduct an in camera
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12911 - 2005-03-31
motion for a new trial. On appeal, he challenges the trial court’s refusal to conduct an in camera
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12911 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jamie R. Miller
trial. On appeal, he challenges the trial court’s refusal to conduct an in camera review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12911 - 2017-09-21
trial. On appeal, he challenges the trial court’s refusal to conduct an in camera review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12911 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
pornography and an order of the trial court denying his postconviction motion, without a hearing.1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=816042 - 2024-06-25
pornography and an order of the trial court denying his postconviction motion, without a hearing.1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=816042 - 2024-06-25
[PDF]
Charlie Tate, Jr. v. General Casualty Co. of Wisconsin
. General Casualty claims: (1) the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when it excluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16331 - 2017-09-21
. General Casualty claims: (1) the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when it excluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16331 - 2017-09-21