Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25301 - 25310 of 70139 for hi.
Search results 25301 - 25310 of 70139 for hi.
[PDF]
Marvin G. Bartholf v. Rita J. Bartholf
placement and sole legal custody of John to his father. ¶3 Rita contends that the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16269 - 2017-09-21
placement and sole legal custody of John to his father. ¶3 Rita contends that the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16269 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
following the death of his mother, and Larry’s father transferred ownership of his house to Larry. ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73769 - 2011-11-16
following the death of his mother, and Larry’s father transferred ownership of his house to Larry. ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73769 - 2011-11-16
[PDF]
State v. Deymond R. Turner
denying his motion to suppress evidence and from a judgment of conviction for possessing more than forty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26274 - 2017-09-21
denying his motion to suppress evidence and from a judgment of conviction for possessing more than forty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26274 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
), third offense. He argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33305 - 2008-07-08
), third offense. He argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33305 - 2008-07-08
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
after his motion to suppress was denied.2 Newman argues that his suppression motion should have been
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=338362 - 2021-02-24
after his motion to suppress was denied.2 Newman argues that his suppression motion should have been
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=338362 - 2021-02-24
[PDF]
NOTICE
-appellant as “Sobjeck.” 2 In his notice of appeal, Sobjeck purports to appeal from “the final decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32974 - 2014-09-15
-appellant as “Sobjeck.” 2 In his notice of appeal, Sobjeck purports to appeal from “the final decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32974 - 2014-09-15
State v. Cornelius F.
BROWN, J.[1] While the appeal directly concerns a CHIPS[2] disposition relating to his four children
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5913 - 2005-03-31
BROWN, J.[1] While the appeal directly concerns a CHIPS[2] disposition relating to his four children
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5913 - 2005-03-31
State v. Cornelius F.
BROWN, J.[1] While the appeal directly concerns a CHIPS[2] disposition relating to his four children
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5916 - 2005-03-31
BROWN, J.[1] While the appeal directly concerns a CHIPS[2] disposition relating to his four children
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5916 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. The police directed him not to drive the vehicle until they determined his role in the alleged theft
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28690 - 2005-03-31
. The police directed him not to drive the vehicle until they determined his role in the alleged theft
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28690 - 2005-03-31
State v. Cecil L., Jr.
were offered to support a finding that the serious juvenile offender program was inadequate for [his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5866 - 2005-03-31
were offered to support a finding that the serious juvenile offender program was inadequate for [his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5866 - 2005-03-31