Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25301 - 25310 of 64027 for records/1000.
Search results 25301 - 25310 of 64027 for records/1000.
State v. Robert J. King
adequate and whether the sentence was excessive. Upon review of the record, we are satisfied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11235 - 2005-03-31
adequate and whether the sentence was excessive. Upon review of the record, we are satisfied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11235 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we conclude there is no arguable merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=702291 - 2023-09-13
review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we conclude there is no arguable merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=702291 - 2023-09-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not to do so. 2 Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103726 - 2017-09-21
not to do so. 2 Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103726 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
recently visited Miller in jail. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122766 - 2014-10-01
recently visited Miller in jail. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122766 - 2014-10-01
CA Blank Order
. § 805.11(1) (2011-12),[1] we will address them, but our review of the briefs and the record persuades us
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99616 - 2013-07-23
. § 805.11(1) (2011-12),[1] we will address them, but our review of the briefs and the record persuades us
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99616 - 2013-07-23
Montel Horton v. Gary Mccaughtry
may affirm the judgment or order of the trial court if supported by the record. State v. Alles, 106
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8123 - 2005-03-31
may affirm the judgment or order of the trial court if supported by the record. State v. Alles, 106
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8123 - 2005-03-31
Scott Cecil v. KJH Enterprises, Inc.
. The record shows that the trial court rationally considered all of the relevant facts in determining
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14062 - 2005-03-31
. The record shows that the trial court rationally considered all of the relevant facts in determining
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14062 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
an independent review of the record, the no-merit report, and Coleman’s response, we affirmed. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104304 - 2013-11-18
an independent review of the record, the no-merit report, and Coleman’s response, we affirmed. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104304 - 2013-11-18
Patricia J. Tabbutt v. Robert Goree
.” Wis. Stat. § 904.03 (1999-2000).[2] Here, the record does not show that the trial court made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3831 - 2005-03-31
.” Wis. Stat. § 904.03 (1999-2000).[2] Here, the record does not show that the trial court made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3831 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Upon consideration of the no-merit report and response and an independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=228785 - 2018-11-28
. Upon consideration of the no-merit report and response and an independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=228785 - 2018-11-28