Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25301 - 25310 of 58506 for speedy trial.

[PDF] Mary Ellen Kuesel v. Firstar Trust Company
of their own No. 01-3453 3 trusts. On December 11, 2001, the trial court signed an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4732 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Amber J.F. v. Richard B.
of the trial court, allowing Amber to proceed. BACKGROUND On December 6, 1984, Lynn, the mother of Amber
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9727 - 2017-09-19

Thomas Moullette v. City of Rice Lake
a judgment awarding Thomas Moullette $75,000 for personal injuries.[1] The City claims the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4915 - 2005-03-31

Robert S. O'Kon v. Frederick A. Laude
. By summary judgment, the trial court ruled that the adverse possession claim of Robert S. O’Kon and Brenda J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6984 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
2 motion for postconviction relief. 1 Wolfe argues his trial counsel was ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118155 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the trial in this case was completed, Jennifer filed for bankruptcy protection in federal court under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138842 - 2017-09-21

Kenosha County Department of Child & Family Services v. Cornelius N. F.
. Although, after the first day of jury trial, he decided not to contest the issue of abandonment as grounds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6378 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
appeals a judgment convicting her of theft by false representation. Kolner argues the trial court should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56183 - 2010-11-01

[PDF] Dina Matlin v. City of Sheboygan
to hold the hearing within that time did not terminate jurisdiction. We reverse and remand to the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2987 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Kenosha County Department of Human Services v. Luz O.
trial counsel was ineffective. 3 ¶2 We must conclude that prior written court-ordered services
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7329 - 2017-09-20