Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25311 - 25320 of 28855 for W.
Search results 25311 - 25320 of 28855 for W.
State v. Darrin E. Parnell
Parnell treat Josie violently, and Kaley W. testified that she had seen Parnell hit Josie more than once
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15999 - 2005-03-31
Parnell treat Josie violently, and Kaley W. testified that she had seen Parnell hit Josie more than once
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15999 - 2005-03-31
2010 WI APP 82
of Jackson County Corporation Counsel Rian W. Radtke of Skolos, Millis & Matousek, S.C., Black River Falls
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50439 - 2010-06-29
of Jackson County Corporation Counsel Rian W. Radtke of Skolos, Millis & Matousek, S.C., Black River Falls
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50439 - 2010-06-29
State v. Sylvester J. Sasnett, Jr.
not significant. State v. Bettinger, 100 Wis.2d 691, 697, 303 N.W.2d 585, 588 (1981). Therefore, “[w]e must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8326 - 2005-03-31
not significant. State v. Bettinger, 100 Wis.2d 691, 697, 303 N.W.2d 585, 588 (1981). Therefore, “[w]e must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8326 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Rejholec, 2021 WI App 45, ¶16, 398 Wis. 2d 729, 963 N.W.2d 121. However, “[w]here a custodial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=865691 - 2024-10-22
. Rejholec, 2021 WI App 45, ¶16, 398 Wis. 2d 729, 963 N.W.2d 121. However, “[w]here a custodial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=865691 - 2024-10-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
as follows: [W]e conclude that for purposes of the domestic abuse repeater statute, a defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1072923 - 2026-02-04
as follows: [W]e conclude that for purposes of the domestic abuse repeater statute, a defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1072923 - 2026-02-04
Cindy L. Klatt v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
by William W. Cassel. 2003 WI App 197 COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED August 13
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5942 - 2005-03-31
by William W. Cassel. 2003 WI App 197 COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED August 13
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5942 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI App 61
WI App 100, ¶11, 235 Wis. 2d 69, 612 N.W.2d 346. “[W]e are bound
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1008493 - 2025-11-20
WI App 100, ¶11, 235 Wis. 2d 69, 612 N.W.2d 346. “[W]e are bound
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1008493 - 2025-11-20
Christina Lynn Redfearn v. William Dennis Redfearn
. Indeed, the Hokin court cautioned that: “[W]e do not hold that the Court on remand may not deviate from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3799 - 2005-03-31
. Indeed, the Hokin court cautioned that: “[W]e do not hold that the Court on remand may not deviate from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3799 - 2005-03-31
Randy O'Neill v. James Reemer
, there was a brief by Gerald W. Laabs and Laabs, Skolos & Mills, LLP, Black River Falls, and James M. Isaacson
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16544 - 2005-03-31
, there was a brief by Gerald W. Laabs and Laabs, Skolos & Mills, LLP, Black River Falls, and James M. Isaacson
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16544 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 97
protected by the Second Amendment because “[w]hile the statute might be characterized as prohibiting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155961 - 2017-09-21
protected by the Second Amendment because “[w]hile the statute might be characterized as prohibiting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155961 - 2017-09-21