Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25311 - 25320 of 30247 for de.
Search results 25311 - 25320 of 30247 for de.
Steven T. Robinson v. City of West Allis
Our review of the trial court’s decision to grant summary judgment is de novo.[2] See Green Spring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13944 - 2005-03-31
Our review of the trial court’s decision to grant summary judgment is de novo.[2] See Green Spring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13944 - 2005-03-31
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Michelle L. Tully
Against Sosnay, 209 Wis. 2d 241, 243, 562 N.W.2d 137 (1997). Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18841 - 2005-07-05
Against Sosnay, 209 Wis. 2d 241, 243, 562 N.W.2d 137 (1997). Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18841 - 2005-07-05
[PDF]
WI App 22
Whether a Confrontation Clause violation has occurred is a question of law we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=342188 - 2021-05-10
Whether a Confrontation Clause violation has occurred is a question of law we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=342188 - 2021-05-10
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
by § 974.06 in any particular case presents a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Tolefree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=188130 - 2017-09-21
by § 974.06 in any particular case presents a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Tolefree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=188130 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to the party are questions of law that this court reviews de novo. Id. B. J.J.’s Ineffectiveness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249453 - 2019-10-29
to the party are questions of law that this court reviews de novo. Id. B. J.J.’s Ineffectiveness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249453 - 2019-10-29
Erika Eneman v. Pat Richter
of the common law doctrine of public officer immunity is a question of law which we review de novo. Kimps v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11536 - 2005-03-31
of the common law doctrine of public officer immunity is a question of law which we review de novo. Kimps v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11536 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
applies are questions of law, which this court reviews de novo. State v. Sharp, 180 Wis. 2d 640, 650
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73607 - 2014-09-15
applies are questions of law, which this court reviews de novo. State v. Sharp, 180 Wis. 2d 640, 650
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73607 - 2014-09-15
Gerald Trott v. Wisconsin Department of Health & Family Services
the interpretation of a statute, is a question of law that we review de novo.” Hillhaven Corp. v. DHFS, 232 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2656 - 2005-03-31
the interpretation of a statute, is a question of law that we review de novo.” Hillhaven Corp. v. DHFS, 232 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2656 - 2005-03-31
Mary A. Cruz v. All Saints Healthcare System, Inc.
action is a matter of statutory interpretation, which is a question of law subject to our de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2651 - 2005-03-31
action is a matter of statutory interpretation, which is a question of law subject to our de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2651 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
entitle the defendant to relief. This is a question of law that we review de novo.” State v. Allen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41513 - 2014-09-15
entitle the defendant to relief. This is a question of law that we review de novo.” State v. Allen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41513 - 2014-09-15