Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25311 - 25320 of 61897 for does.
Search results 25311 - 25320 of 61897 for does.
[PDF]
State v. James R. Donohoo
named in the injunction. The definition does not require what Donohoo proposes—that a named
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8563 - 2017-09-19
named in the injunction. The definition does not require what Donohoo proposes—that a named
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8563 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Ultimately, whether or not DeLaLuz was Padilla-Martinez’s wife does not affect our decision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208326 - 2018-02-14
. Ultimately, whether or not DeLaLuz was Padilla-Martinez’s wife does not affect our decision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208326 - 2018-02-14
COURT OF APPEALS
that the comment “does not rise to the level of a material breach” so “trial counsel was not ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79434 - 2012-03-12
that the comment “does not rise to the level of a material breach” so “trial counsel was not ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79434 - 2012-03-12
[PDF]
State v. Troy Davis
. The standard by which cruel and unusual punishment is determined does not preclude a sentence within
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13501 - 2017-09-21
. The standard by which cruel and unusual punishment is determined does not preclude a sentence within
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13501 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
supreme court has explained that § 757.19(2)(g) does not require disqualification. See American TV
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110999 - 2017-09-21
supreme court has explained that § 757.19(2)(g) does not require disqualification. See American TV
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110999 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, not the judge. In reply, Alston does not dispute that the warden would be the proper respondent. Instead
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196693 - 2017-09-21
, not the judge. In reply, Alston does not dispute that the warden would be the proper respondent. Instead
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196693 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Baron L. Walker, Sr. v. Daniel Bertrand
was not mentioned in the report and could perhaps give a written statement. The record does not indicate, however
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13550 - 2017-09-21
was not mentioned in the report and could perhaps give a written statement. The record does not indicate, however
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13550 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of proceeding and that he does not wish to do that. Trial counsel argued that Olmstead’s decision to pursue
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109035 - 2017-09-21
of proceeding and that he does not wish to do that. Trial counsel argued that Olmstead’s decision to pursue
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109035 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
does not have to be licensed in a profession in order to testify about its standard of care. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250223 - 2019-11-20
does not have to be licensed in a profession in order to testify about its standard of care. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250223 - 2019-11-20
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey L. Neuman
. No. 01-2033-CR 4 ¶6 The State does not oppose a remand to determine Neuman’s claim to additional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4239 - 2017-09-19
. No. 01-2033-CR 4 ¶6 The State does not oppose a remand to determine Neuman’s claim to additional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4239 - 2017-09-19