Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25321 - 25330 of 57152 for id.
Search results 25321 - 25330 of 57152 for id.
[PDF]
NOTICE
’ the intrusion of the stop.” Id. (citing Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 21 (1968). “[W]hat constitutes reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58159 - 2014-09-15
’ the intrusion of the stop.” Id. (citing Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 21 (1968). “[W]hat constitutes reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58159 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the evidence supports reversal. Id. at 505-07. It is the function of the jury, not of an appellate court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219216 - 2018-09-18
of the evidence supports reversal. Id. at 505-07. It is the function of the jury, not of an appellate court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219216 - 2018-09-18
[PDF]
State v. Gregory H. Wilcox
of counsel is a legal determination, which this court decides de novo. Id. at 634, 369 N.W.2d at 715
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14418 - 2014-09-15
of counsel is a legal determination, which this court decides de novo. Id. at 634, 369 N.W.2d at 715
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14418 - 2014-09-15
State v. Adam V. Tovsen
-criminal traffic law. See id., ¶13. The question of what constitutes reasonable suspicion is a common
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7077 - 2005-03-31
-criminal traffic law. See id., ¶13. The question of what constitutes reasonable suspicion is a common
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7077 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
to relief.[5] Id., ¶14. Conclusory allegations are insufficient. Id., ¶15. A defendant alleging
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76949 - 2012-01-23
to relief.[5] Id., ¶14. Conclusory allegations are insufficient. Id., ¶15. A defendant alleging
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76949 - 2012-01-23
COURT OF APPEALS
without denial. Id., ¶36 (internal citations and parentheticals omitted). ¶7 Further, evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76011 - 2012-01-03
without denial. Id., ¶36 (internal citations and parentheticals omitted). ¶7 Further, evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76011 - 2012-01-03
[PDF]
State v. Phillip C. Ziegler
is a legal determination, which this court decides de novo. See id. at 634. ANALYSIS Newly Discovered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15987 - 2017-09-21
is a legal determination, which this court decides de novo. See id. at 634. ANALYSIS Newly Discovered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15987 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that we review de novo. Id., ¶33. However, whether a new factor warrants sentence modification lies
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=633235 - 2023-03-16
that we review de novo. Id., ¶33. However, whether a new factor warrants sentence modification lies
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=633235 - 2023-03-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at sentencing. Id., ¶3-4. The Elward court held that it was an ex post facto violation to impose a DNA
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192378 - 2017-09-21
at sentencing. Id., ¶3-4. The Elward court held that it was an ex post facto violation to impose a DNA
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192378 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 27, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
, and accepted meaning….” Id., ¶15. Section 343.305(5)(a) states: The person who submits to the test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27565 - 2006-12-26
, and accepted meaning….” Id., ¶15. Section 343.305(5)(a) states: The person who submits to the test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27565 - 2006-12-26