Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25321 - 25330 of 39558 for probate forms.
Search results 25321 - 25330 of 39558 for probate forms.
State v. Oto Orlik
the defendant is currently on probation, extended supervision or parole, whether the defendant is already
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14570 - 2005-03-31
the defendant is currently on probation, extended supervision or parole, whether the defendant is already
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14570 - 2005-03-31
2009 WI APP 137
visit from his probation officer, Agent Patti Doerr. During the home visit, Doerr observed what
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38547 - 2009-09-28
visit from his probation officer, Agent Patti Doerr. During the home visit, Doerr observed what
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38547 - 2009-09-28
State v. James E. Szulczewski
the person on probation to the DOC under § 973.09(1)(a) or (3) for not more than 60 days.[5] Although
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17114 - 2005-03-31
the person on probation to the DOC under § 973.09(1)(a) or (3) for not more than 60 days.[5] Although
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17114 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Brown County Department of Health & Human Services v. Tammy L.W.
Tammy was jailed on a probation hold in October 1998, a referral was made to the department
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3592 - 2017-09-19
Tammy was jailed on a probation hold in October 1998, a referral was made to the department
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3592 - 2017-09-19
2009 WI APP 84
promptly file the statement with the court having probate jurisdiction in the county of detention
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36553 - 2011-02-07
promptly file the statement with the court having probate jurisdiction in the county of detention
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36553 - 2011-02-07
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the sentence and placed Overton on four years’ probation. Overton appeals. II. DISCUSSION ¶10 “[A]n
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=670587 - 2023-06-21
the sentence and placed Overton on four years’ probation. Overton appeals. II. DISCUSSION ¶10 “[A]n
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=670587 - 2023-06-21
State v. Hayes Johnson
,” and that the prosecutor would recommend that any sentence “run concurrent to [Johnson’s] probation revocation time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12466 - 2005-03-31
,” and that the prosecutor would recommend that any sentence “run concurrent to [Johnson’s] probation revocation time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12466 - 2005-03-31
Brown County Department of Health & Human Services v. Tammy L.W.
Services dating from 1991 arising from neglect. After Tammy was jailed on a probation hold in October 1998
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3591 - 2005-03-31
Services dating from 1991 arising from neglect. After Tammy was jailed on a probation hold in October 1998
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3591 - 2005-03-31
State v. Mighty T. Howell
been found delinquent for burglary and placed on probation, and that he did not have any mental
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25906 - 2006-08-29
been found delinquent for burglary and placed on probation, and that he did not have any mental
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25906 - 2006-08-29
COURT OF APPEALS
probation/parole statement; Officer Lough did not testify at Cameron’s trial, nor was Officer Lough named
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114791 - 2014-06-18
probation/parole statement; Officer Lough did not testify at Cameron’s trial, nor was Officer Lough named
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114791 - 2014-06-18