Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25331 - 25340 of 91512 for 1.
Search results 25331 - 25340 of 91512 for 1.
COURT OF APPEALS
. GLONEK, Judge. Affirmed. Before Hoover, P.J., Peterson and Brunner, JJ. ¶1 PER
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33165 - 2008-06-23
. GLONEK, Judge. Affirmed. Before Hoover, P.J., Peterson and Brunner, JJ. ¶1 PER
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33165 - 2008-06-23
CA Blank Order
report pursuant to Wis. Stat. Rule 809.32 (2013-14)[1] and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=146175 - 2015-08-18
report pursuant to Wis. Stat. Rule 809.32 (2013-14)[1] and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=146175 - 2015-08-18
[PDF]
NOTICE
. ¶1 BRIDGE, J.1 Jefferson County appeals an order dismissing the County’s action against Heidi J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34330 - 2014-09-15
. ¶1 BRIDGE, J.1 Jefferson County appeals an order dismissing the County’s action against Heidi J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34330 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. RULE 809.32 (2019-20),1 concluding that no grounds exist to challenge Marion’s convictions for two
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=512169 - 2022-04-27
. RULE 809.32 (2019-20),1 concluding that no grounds exist to challenge Marion’s convictions for two
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=512169 - 2022-04-27
[PDF]
Stephen E. Lee v. Labor & Industry Review Commission
because he No. 95-0797 -2- did not file a brief as the trial court had ordered.1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8807 - 2017-09-19
because he No. 95-0797 -2- did not file a brief as the trial court had ordered.1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8807 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Michael D. Singleton
§§ 943.32(1)(b) & (2), 939.641(2), and 939.32, STATS. Singleton also appeals from an order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10470 - 2017-09-20
§§ 943.32(1)(b) & (2), 939.641(2), and 939.32, STATS. Singleton also appeals from an order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10470 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition.1 See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22).2 We summarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=917151 - 2025-02-20
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition.1 See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22).2 We summarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=917151 - 2025-02-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to withdraw as appellate counsel. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 (2015-16), 1 and Anders v. California, 386
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195399 - 2017-09-21
to withdraw as appellate counsel. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 (2015-16), 1 and Anders v. California, 386
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195399 - 2017-09-21
Research Planning v. DNR
. Before Lundsten, P.J., Vergeront and Deininger, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Research
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21628 - 2006-03-01
. Before Lundsten, P.J., Vergeront and Deininger, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Research
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21628 - 2006-03-01
COURT OF APPEALS
, Judges.[1] Affirmed. ¶1 CURLEY, P.J.[2] James R. Matel appeals a judgment convicting him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64697 - 2011-05-23
, Judges.[1] Affirmed. ¶1 CURLEY, P.J.[2] James R. Matel appeals a judgment convicting him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64697 - 2011-05-23