Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25331 - 25340 of 63771 for Motion for joint custody.

[PDF] State v. Jeffrey Kenneth Krohn
, the order denying his motion to vacate the restitution order, and the order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4154 - 2017-09-20

State v. Jesse Ruiz
PER CURIAM. Jesse Ruiz appeals pro se from a postconviction order summarily denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25413 - 2006-06-05

WI App 15 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2010AP599-CR Complete Titl...
, and that the circuit court erred when it denied his motion to suppress the additional drugs discovered during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58245 - 2011-01-30

[PDF] State v. Jesse Ruiz
. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Jesse Ruiz appeals pro se from a postconviction order summarily denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25413 - 2017-09-21

State v. Maurice A. Fields
. § 940.225(2)(a)[1]. He also appeals the order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Fields argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4653 - 2005-03-31

State v. Willie J. Hickles
court denied the motion and a supplemental motion. Hickles appeals pro se, arguing that the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26217 - 2006-08-14

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
for operating under the influence of an intoxicant or other drug (OWI) as a second offense; (2) his “motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=556881 - 2022-08-18

[PDF] WI App 139
. 2012AP236-CR 2012AP237-CR 2 motion. Brown argues that his plea colloquy was defective because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89425 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] NOTICE
., Lundsten and Bridge, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. John Ahlf appeals an order which denied his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36486 - 2014-09-15

State v. Henry J. Brookshire
postconviction motions. He argues that trial counsel was ineffective and that the trial court erred in denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9258 - 2005-03-31