Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25331 - 25340 of 34004 for dismissal.
Search results 25331 - 25340 of 34004 for dismissal.
[PDF]
State v. Roger A. Schultz
is that count two will be dismissed. Our further agreement is that the state will agree not to bring any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15013 - 2017-09-21
is that count two will be dismissed. Our further agreement is that the state will agree not to bring any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15013 - 2017-09-21
Sagler Masonry & Concrete v. Jeff Netzer
or any adjourned date thereof the defendant may answer, move to dismiss under s. 802.06(2) or otherwise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10869 - 2005-03-31
or any adjourned date thereof the defendant may answer, move to dismiss under s. 802.06(2) or otherwise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10869 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
intercourse in the backseat of his car. Pursuant to a plea agreement, the State agreed to dismiss and read
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=176242 - 2017-09-21
intercourse in the backseat of his car. Pursuant to a plea agreement, the State agreed to dismiss and read
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=176242 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
were dismissed on the prosecutor’s motion. 2 This court consolidated Weatherall’s two separate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194031 - 2017-09-21
were dismissed on the prosecutor’s motion. 2 This court consolidated Weatherall’s two separate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194031 - 2017-09-21
State v. Shane K. Hanson
and his parents. It denied Hanson’s motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction and asked Hanson whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4461 - 2005-03-31
and his parents. It denied Hanson’s motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction and asked Hanson whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4461 - 2005-03-31
State v. Claude Lowery
. The petition was initially dismissed on the grounds that ch. 980 was unconstitutional. This ruling, however
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11834 - 2005-03-31
. The petition was initially dismissed on the grounds that ch. 980 was unconstitutional. This ruling, however
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11834 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
charge, Card then moved for dismissal, arguing a double jeopardy violation. The circuit court denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49414 - 2010-04-28
charge, Card then moved for dismissal, arguing a double jeopardy violation. The circuit court denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49414 - 2010-04-28
[PDF]
State v. Latasha J.
of the court. The sanction of dismissal or judgment is drastic and, therefore, should only be imposed when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6061 - 2017-09-19
of the court. The sanction of dismissal or judgment is drastic and, therefore, should only be imposed when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6061 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
no sentence had been imposed yet due to a diversion agreement that could ultimately lead to dismissal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214264 - 2018-06-14
no sentence had been imposed yet due to a diversion agreement that could ultimately lead to dismissal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214264 - 2018-06-14
COURT OF APPEALS
., Nettesheim and Snyder, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Thomas and Sarah Kyle appeal from a judgment dismissing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29897 - 2007-08-07
., Nettesheim and Snyder, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Thomas and Sarah Kyle appeal from a judgment dismissing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29897 - 2007-08-07