Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25331 - 25340 of 33989 for dismissal.
Search results 25331 - 25340 of 33989 for dismissal.
[PDF]
State v. Donald P. Sullivan
was striking at an officer. But Sullivan dismisses this argument by claiming that the State cannot presume
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10129 - 2017-09-19
was striking at an officer. But Sullivan dismisses this argument by claiming that the State cannot presume
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10129 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Albert L. Otto v. Nancy Kremer
and dismissed the action. This appeal followed. ANALYSIS ¶7 Otto argues that the circuit court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15883 - 2017-09-21
and dismissed the action. This appeal followed. ANALYSIS ¶7 Otto argues that the circuit court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15883 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, JJ. ¶1 DONALD, J. Brian A. Patterson, pro se, appeals the summary judgment order dismissing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252322 - 2020-01-14
, JJ. ¶1 DONALD, J. Brian A. Patterson, pro se, appeals the summary judgment order dismissing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252322 - 2020-01-14
Casanova Retail Liquor Store, Inc. v. State
not abuse its discretion by dismissing the petition for reinstatement. We specifically stated "we do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9079 - 2005-03-31
not abuse its discretion by dismissing the petition for reinstatement. We specifically stated "we do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9079 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jon P. Torok
. The charges for possession of THC and operating with prohibited alcohol concentration were dismissed. Torok
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19449 - 2005-08-29
. The charges for possession of THC and operating with prohibited alcohol concentration were dismissed. Torok
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19449 - 2005-08-29
COURT OF APPEALS
the court for dismissal of the charges against him, or in the alternative for suppression of all evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85468 - 2012-07-25
the court for dismissal of the charges against him, or in the alternative for suppression of all evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85468 - 2012-07-25
COURT OF APPEALS
judgment in favor of the defendant Germantown Mutual Insurance Company, dismissing Birkholz’s claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101773 - 2013-09-10
judgment in favor of the defendant Germantown Mutual Insurance Company, dismissing Birkholz’s claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101773 - 2013-09-10
COURT OF APPEALS
behavior. While the case was reportedly dismissed, witnessing the assaults would be a part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65479 - 2011-06-13
behavior. While the case was reportedly dismissed, witnessing the assaults would be a part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65479 - 2011-06-13
COURT OF APPEALS
of this appeal is on the interpretation of a March 2010 written “stipulated dismissal” (the “stipulation”) under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106463 - 2014-01-08
of this appeal is on the interpretation of a March 2010 written “stipulated dismissal” (the “stipulation”) under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106463 - 2014-01-08
COURT OF APPEALS
seeks reversal of the circuit court’s order, not dismissal of its appeal on the ground of mootness. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34063 - 2008-09-17
seeks reversal of the circuit court’s order, not dismissal of its appeal on the ground of mootness. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34063 - 2008-09-17