Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25331 - 25340 of 43166 for t o.
Search results 25331 - 25340 of 43166 for t o.
COURT OF APPEALS
” method the officer used. ¶19 The court responded to these comments by first stating that “[t]he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29819 - 2007-07-25
” method the officer used. ¶19 The court responded to these comments by first stating that “[t]he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29819 - 2007-07-25
CA Blank Order
that Shawlin was drugged. Instead, Guerard states, “[t]he only mention in the [medical] report about
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104396 - 2013-11-12
that Shawlin was drugged. Instead, Guerard states, “[t]he only mention in the [medical] report about
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104396 - 2013-11-12
Waukesha County Department of Health and Human Services v. Crystal P.
that “[t]he language of both §§ 48.415(2)(a) and 48.356(2) show[s] that the legislature has chosen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16138 - 2005-03-31
that “[t]he language of both §§ 48.415(2)(a) and 48.356(2) show[s] that the legislature has chosen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16138 - 2005-03-31
Julie Ann Walberg v. St. Francis Home, Inc.
Gleisner, Milwaukee; and Jason T. Studinksi and Klammer & Studinski, Portage, on behalf of the Wisconsin
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18405 - 2015-07-13
Gleisner, Milwaukee; and Jason T. Studinksi and Klammer & Studinski, Portage, on behalf of the Wisconsin
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18405 - 2015-07-13
COURT OF APPEALS
State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Michael T. O'Haver
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98299 - 2013-06-19
State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Michael T. O'Haver
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98299 - 2013-06-19
State v. Donald A. Kozinski
the evidence). Moreover, Kozinski’s trial lawyer told the court at the sentencing hearing that: [T]he people
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12101 - 2015-06-23
the evidence). Moreover, Kozinski’s trial lawyer told the court at the sentencing hearing that: [T]he people
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12101 - 2015-06-23
COURT OF APPEALS
) (emphasis added). Further, “[t]he court may, however, set aside the commission’s order or award and remand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49312 - 2010-04-27
) (emphasis added). Further, “[t]he court may, however, set aside the commission’s order or award and remand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49312 - 2010-04-27
State v. Lamarcus D. Jones
court explained: [T]his morning I have been informed by my deputies that in the course of dealing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7107 - 2005-03-31
court explained: [T]his morning I have been informed by my deputies that in the course of dealing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7107 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
specifically rejected such a practice in Welter, where we held: [T]he circuit court erred when it upheld
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83228 - 2012-06-04
specifically rejected such a practice in Welter, where we held: [T]he circuit court erred when it upheld
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83228 - 2012-06-04
State v. Walter Szymanski
investigation is not terribly relevant to the sentencing equation. ...[T]he fact is that the defendant's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9989 - 2005-03-31
investigation is not terribly relevant to the sentencing equation. ...[T]he fact is that the defendant's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9989 - 2005-03-31