Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25351 - 25360 of 29828 for des.
Search results 25351 - 25360 of 29828 for des.
State v. Barry A. Kundert
is whether a defendant’s constitutional rights were violated, we decide the question de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3442 - 2009-12-28
is whether a defendant’s constitutional rights were violated, we decide the question de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3442 - 2009-12-28
Stephanie M. Kaplan v. Susan Riseling
of the common law doctrine of public officer immunity is a question of law which we review de novo. Kimps v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11560 - 2005-03-31
of the common law doctrine of public officer immunity is a question of law which we review de novo. Kimps v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11560 - 2005-03-31
Tara L. Harrison v. Pat Richter
of the common law doctrine of public officer immunity is a question of law which we review de novo. Kimps v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11537 - 2005-03-31
of the common law doctrine of public officer immunity is a question of law which we review de novo. Kimps v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11537 - 2005-03-31
Randie Rowell v. Aldred Ash
of punitive damages should have been submitted to the jury, the appellate court reviews the record de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14609 - 2005-03-31
of punitive damages should have been submitted to the jury, the appellate court reviews the record de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14609 - 2005-03-31
State v. Arthur Beiersdorf
of § 973.155(1)(a), Stats., to undisputed facts presents a question of law this court reviews de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9012 - 2005-03-31
of § 973.155(1)(a), Stats., to undisputed facts presents a question of law this court reviews de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9012 - 2005-03-31
State v. Arthur Beiersdorf
of § 973.155(1)(a), Stats., to undisputed facts presents a question of law this court reviews de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9013 - 2005-03-31
of § 973.155(1)(a), Stats., to undisputed facts presents a question of law this court reviews de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9013 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
those determinations de novo. See id. at 18. The State also has the burden of proving the defendant’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45960 - 2014-02-16
those determinations de novo. See id. at 18. The State also has the burden of proving the defendant’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45960 - 2014-02-16
Deutsches Land, Inc. v. City of Glendale
the record de novo, applying the same standard and following the same methodology required of the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19038 - 2005-07-18
the record de novo, applying the same standard and following the same methodology required of the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19038 - 2005-07-18
WI App 14 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2013AP2323 Complete Title of...
the constitutionality of a law’s retroactive effect de novo. Id., ¶26 n.14. ¶16 With these guidelines in mind, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132765 - 2015-02-24
the constitutionality of a law’s retroactive effect de novo. Id., ¶26 n.14. ¶16 With these guidelines in mind, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132765 - 2015-02-24
[PDF]
State v. Mario V. Whitney
of law, which we review de novo. State v. Johnson, 2000 WI 12, ¶18, 232 Wis. 2d 679, 605 N.W.2d 846
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4449 - 2017-09-19
of law, which we review de novo. State v. Johnson, 2000 WI 12, ¶18, 232 Wis. 2d 679, 605 N.W.2d 846
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4449 - 2017-09-19