Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25351 - 25360 of 29740 for des.
Search results 25351 - 25360 of 29740 for des.
Carol Marie Bannigan v. Jeffrey Harold Johnson
is a question of law, which we generally review de novo. See Van Offeren, 173 Wis. 2d at 492. A circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15613 - 2005-03-31
is a question of law, which we generally review de novo. See Van Offeren, 173 Wis. 2d at 492. A circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15613 - 2005-03-31
State v. Melvin Thompson
review de novo. See Edgeberg, 188 Wis.2d at 344-45, 524 N.W.2d at 914. However, we review the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13044 - 2006-12-26
review de novo. See Edgeberg, 188 Wis.2d at 344-45, 524 N.W.2d at 914. However, we review the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13044 - 2006-12-26
COURT OF APPEALS
interpretation is a question of law, which we review de novo. Zwiefelhofer v. Town of Cooks Valley, 2012 WI 7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105607 - 2013-12-16
interpretation is a question of law, which we review de novo. Zwiefelhofer v. Town of Cooks Valley, 2012 WI 7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105607 - 2013-12-16
State v. Robert F. Hart
we review de novo. State v. Betterley, 191 Wis. 2d 407, 415-16, 529 N.W.2d 216 (1995). ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2642 - 2005-03-31
we review de novo. State v. Betterley, 191 Wis. 2d 407, 415-16, 529 N.W.2d 216 (1995). ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2642 - 2005-03-31
2009 WI APP 157
, our review is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 315–317, 401 N.W.2d 816
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40585 - 2009-10-27
, our review is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 315–317, 401 N.W.2d 816
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40585 - 2009-10-27
Jeffrey Loy v. Dodgeville School District
as the trial court and review de novo the grant or denial of summary judgment. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6690 - 2007-08-27
as the trial court and review de novo the grant or denial of summary judgment. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6690 - 2007-08-27
State v. Jeremy D. Russ
communicate.” ¶7 Which party bears the burden of proof presents a question of law for our de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20692 - 2006-01-24
communicate.” ¶7 Which party bears the burden of proof presents a question of law for our de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20692 - 2006-01-24
COURT OF APPEALS
court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, owing no deference to the circuit court. Krier, 317 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134585 - 2015-02-09
court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, owing no deference to the circuit court. Krier, 317 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134585 - 2015-02-09
State v. Terron Napper
review is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Munoz, 200 Wis.2d 391, 395, 546 N.W.2d 570
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8364 - 2005-03-31
review is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Munoz, 200 Wis.2d 391, 395, 546 N.W.2d 570
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8364 - 2005-03-31
WI App 112 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2011AP1789-CR Complete Titl...
to constitutional principles de novo. Id. Here, the trial court found that the homeowner’s call was a “legitimate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86921 - 2013-02-20
to constitutional principles de novo. Id. Here, the trial court found that the homeowner’s call was a “legitimate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86921 - 2013-02-20