Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25351 - 25360 of 58506 for speedy trial.

[PDF] State v. Cheryl A. Koenig
affirm the trial court’s order. FACTS ¶2 On November 14, 2000, Koenig was charged with two counts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5183 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Claudia M. Bourassa v. Hallmark Group Realtors
then demanded a trial.1 Hallmark filed a counterclaim seeking reimbursement of 50% of Bourassa’s commissions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14740 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
). 1 Jordan argues the circuit court erred when it denied his motion to exclude evidence at trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162250 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI APP 119
with the board a notice of appeal.”). The Board held an evidentiary trial on Sliwinski’s appeal, see § 62.50
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33057 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Mutual Service Insurance Companies v. Brian Betterley
is whether a new trial should be granted in this personal injury case because the jury’s answers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7307 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] Bankers Trust Company of California, N.A. v. Dan Bregant
the sale of a foreclosed residential condominium unit. Woodlands contends that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5531 - 2017-09-19

State v. William R. Estes
] William R. Estes appeals from the judgment, following a jury trial, convicting him of his second offense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4952 - 2005-03-31

Kenosha County Department of Human Services v. Luz O.
contends that her trial counsel was ineffective.[3] ¶2 We must conclude that prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7328 - 2005-03-31

Kenosha County Department of Human Services v. Luz O.
contends that her trial counsel was ineffective.[3] ¶2 We must conclude that prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7329 - 2005-03-31

Kenosha County Department of Human Services v. Luz O.
contends that her trial counsel was ineffective.[3] ¶2 We must conclude that prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7327 - 2005-03-31