Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25361 - 25370 of 62741 for child support.
Search results 25361 - 25370 of 62741 for child support.
State v. Craig T. Bates
counsel, and that the evidence was insufficient to support the convictions. We reject these claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11523 - 2005-03-31
counsel, and that the evidence was insufficient to support the convictions. We reject these claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11523 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Todd J. Gerrits
that this court may find a different and lawful justification for the stop if supported by the record, despite
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15311 - 2017-09-21
that this court may find a different and lawful justification for the stop if supported by the record, despite
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15311 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
there was sufficient evidence to support the jury’s finding of guilt as to Hoffmann’s convictions; (2) whether
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=916618 - 2025-02-19
there was sufficient evidence to support the jury’s finding of guilt as to Hoffmann’s convictions; (2) whether
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=916618 - 2025-02-19
[PDF]
State v. Joseph H. Gray
was for the trier of fact, and we must adopt all reasonable inferences which support the jury’s verdict. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21482 - 2017-09-21
was for the trier of fact, and we must adopt all reasonable inferences which support the jury’s verdict. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21482 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for his claim.” In support, he cites State v. Howard, 211 Wis. 2d 269, 564 N.W.2d 753 (1997), which, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=78241 - 2014-09-15
for his claim.” In support, he cites State v. Howard, 211 Wis. 2d 269, 564 N.W.2d 753 (1997), which, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=78241 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
to support a conviction is that “an appellate court may not substitute its judgment for that of the trier
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27466 - 2014-09-15
to support a conviction is that “an appellate court may not substitute its judgment for that of the trier
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27466 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that the evidence was insufficient to support the court’s conclusion that she was intoxicated. We disagree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184280 - 2017-09-21
that the evidence was insufficient to support the court’s conclusion that she was intoxicated. We disagree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184280 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was not supported by reasonable suspicion. The circuit court denied the suppression motion after an evidentiary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=956833 - 2025-05-15
was not supported by reasonable suspicion. The circuit court denied the suppression motion after an evidentiary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=956833 - 2025-05-15
MEE Bellevue, LLC v. Winnebago County
to the town board. The board of adjustment then reviewed the findings to assure that they were supported
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6764 - 2005-03-31
to the town board. The board of adjustment then reviewed the findings to assure that they were supported
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6764 - 2005-03-31
State v. Carl Andre Brown
suppressed and that the evidence was insufficient to support the conviction. We reject his claims and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7043 - 2005-03-31
suppressed and that the evidence was insufficient to support the conviction. We reject his claims and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7043 - 2005-03-31