Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25361 - 25370 of 76707 for judgment for u s.
Search results 25361 - 25370 of 76707 for judgment for u s.
[PDF]
State v. George Taylor
a Chapter 980 judgment. Taylor claims that: (1) he was denied effective assistance of counsel when his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13870 - 2014-09-15
a Chapter 980 judgment. Taylor claims that: (1) he was denied effective assistance of counsel when his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13870 - 2014-09-15
State v. Harold W. Zastrow
circumstances. Zastrow’ s last claim fails. By the Court.—Judgments and orders affirmed. This opinion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15628 - 2005-03-31
circumstances. Zastrow’ s last claim fails. By the Court.—Judgments and orders affirmed. This opinion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15628 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
found by the agency in a contested case proceeding, the court shall not substitute its judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49312 - 2010-04-27
found by the agency in a contested case proceeding, the court shall not substitute its judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49312 - 2010-04-27
State v. George Taylor
a post-commitment order denying his motion to vacate a Chapter 980 judgment. Taylor claims that: (1) he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13870 - 2005-03-31
a post-commitment order denying his motion to vacate a Chapter 980 judgment. Taylor claims that: (1) he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13870 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Dodge County: JOSEPH G. SCIASCIA, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197690 - 2017-10-12
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Dodge County: JOSEPH G. SCIASCIA, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197690 - 2017-10-12
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 29, 2010 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court of...
the circuit court’s post-judgment child support order. He contends the circuit court erroneously exercised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52685 - 2010-07-28
the circuit court’s post-judgment child support order. He contends the circuit court erroneously exercised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52685 - 2010-07-28
[PDF]
State v. Harold W. Zastrow
defenses and mitigating circumstances. Zastrow’ s last claim fails. By the Court.—Judgments and orders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15628 - 2017-09-21
defenses and mitigating circumstances. Zastrow’ s last claim fails. By the Court.—Judgments and orders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15628 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, viewed most favorably to the [S]tate and the conviction, is so insufficient in probative value
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=216149 - 2018-07-24
, viewed most favorably to the [S]tate and the conviction, is so insufficient in probative value
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=216149 - 2018-07-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
from a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Waupaca County: VICKI L. CLUSSMAN, Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=300018 - 2020-10-29
from a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Waupaca County: VICKI L. CLUSSMAN, Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=300018 - 2020-10-29
[PDF]
WI APP 31
Wis. 2d 633, 681 N.W.2d 110 (“[S]tatutory interpretation ‘begins with the language of the statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=792437 - 2024-06-20
Wis. 2d 633, 681 N.W.2d 110 (“[S]tatutory interpretation ‘begins with the language of the statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=792437 - 2024-06-20