Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25361 - 25370 of 58492 for speedy trial.
Search results 25361 - 25370 of 58492 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
State v. Anthony D. Gritz
) the No. 97-2360-CR 2 trial court erred when it admitted evidence of a prior conviction. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12889 - 2017-09-21
) the No. 97-2360-CR 2 trial court erred when it admitted evidence of a prior conviction. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12889 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, that the trial court should permit the defendant to withdraw the plea to correct a ‘manifest injustice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=228078 - 2018-11-28
, that the trial court should permit the defendant to withdraw the plea to correct a ‘manifest injustice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=228078 - 2018-11-28
[PDF]
Dina Matlin v. City of Sheboygan
to hold the hearing within that time did not terminate jurisdiction. We reverse and remand to the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2986 - 2017-09-19
to hold the hearing within that time did not terminate jurisdiction. We reverse and remand to the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2986 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
driver’s license. The trial court granted the motion and that case was adjourned. On February 2, 2005
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30324 - 2014-09-15
driver’s license. The trial court granted the motion and that case was adjourned. On February 2, 2005
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30324 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
parental rights to his son, Jesse J.E. David argues that he is entitled to a new trial because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32993 - 2014-09-15
parental rights to his son, Jesse J.E. David argues that he is entitled to a new trial because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32993 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Schutze Law Offices v. Joseph Gough
judgment in favor of Joseph Gough in which the trial court held Schutze could not recover attorney fees
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16047 - 2017-09-21
judgment in favor of Joseph Gough in which the trial court held Schutze could not recover attorney fees
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16047 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Kenosha County Department of Human Services v. Luz O.
trial counsel was ineffective. 3 ¶2 We must conclude that prior written court-ordered services
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7327 - 2017-09-20
trial counsel was ineffective. 3 ¶2 We must conclude that prior written court-ordered services
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7327 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Kenosha County Department of Human Services v. Luz O.
trial counsel was ineffective. 3 ¶2 We must conclude that prior written court-ordered services
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7328 - 2017-09-20
trial counsel was ineffective. 3 ¶2 We must conclude that prior written court-ordered services
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7328 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
required by § 971.08(1)(c)). In his response to the no-merit report, Dormanen contends that his trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=508165 - 2022-04-12
required by § 971.08(1)(c)). In his response to the no-merit report, Dormanen contends that his trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=508165 - 2022-04-12
COURT OF APPEALS
benefits. Lampone contends that the trial court erred when it dismissed her action based on the “Doctrine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35893 - 2009-03-16
benefits. Lampone contends that the trial court erred when it dismissed her action based on the “Doctrine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35893 - 2009-03-16