Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25371 - 25380 of 63284 for Motion for joint custody.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. No. 2018AP1078 2 Nowak filed a “Petition/Motion for Judicial Review/Appeal” in the circuit court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247724 - 2019-10-01

[PDF] State v. Steven M. Wrzesinski
than Wrzesinski and a sixteen-year-old. After sentencing, Wrzesinski filed a motion to withdraw
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2367 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
a circuit court order denying her motion to reinstate Daniel Mueller’s obligation to pay child support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50738 - 2010-06-07

Patricia H.S. v. Richard Lee R.
. At this hearing, Richard's attorney filed certain jurisdictional motions, and the court adjourned the matter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11228 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Thomas Willan v. Sheriff Steven Rowe
the records custodian. Furthermore, because a motion to quash is to be decided based on the sufficiency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2742 - 2017-09-19

State v. Shawn Darnell Nunnery
which denied his § 974.06, Stats., motion and the other denying his motion seeking sentence modification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12433 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
denying her motion to reopen and reconsider that judgment. Sue argues that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33920 - 2014-09-15

Thomas Willan v. Sheriff Steven Rowe
. Furthermore, because a motion to quash is to be decided based on the sufficiency of the petition, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2742 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Vances H. Smith v. Gary McCaughtry
in a motion for reconsideration. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm the order. BACKGROUND
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10292 - 2017-09-20

State v. Randy A. Schill
PER CURIAM. Randy Schill appeals an order denying his Wis. Stat. § 974.06[1] postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7387 - 2005-03-31