Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25381 - 25390 of 59327 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 25381 - 25390 of 59327 for SMALL CLAIMS.
[PDF]
State v. David S. Leighton
9 ineffective assistance of counsel claim.7 With respect to adjournment requests by his second
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16075 - 2017-09-21
9 ineffective assistance of counsel claim.7 With respect to adjournment requests by his second
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16075 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Brown- Troop alleges multiple instances of ineffective assistance from trial counsel and he claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=217134 - 2018-08-07
. Brown- Troop alleges multiple instances of ineffective assistance from trial counsel and he claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=217134 - 2018-08-07
[PDF]
State v. Tony G. Longmire
No. 03-0300-CR 2 appeals the court’s order denying his postconviction motion. Longmire claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6129 - 2017-09-19
No. 03-0300-CR 2 appeals the court’s order denying his postconviction motion. Longmire claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6129 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. On the merits of Dryja’s mandamus claim, we conclude that Dryja is entitled to mandamus relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=757697 - 2024-03-14
. On the merits of Dryja’s mandamus claim, we conclude that Dryja is entitled to mandamus relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=757697 - 2024-03-14
Tracy George v. Jon Litscher
claims: (1) costs were recoverable as a matter of fairness and public policy; and (2) costs were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15131 - 2005-03-31
claims: (1) costs were recoverable as a matter of fairness and public policy; and (2) costs were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15131 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
any reason, much less a sufficient one, for failing to raise his current claims in his earlier
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218406 - 2018-08-28
any reason, much less a sufficient one, for failing to raise his current claims in his earlier
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218406 - 2018-08-28
COURT OF APPEALS
limits imposed under § 973.19. While Hicks could have raised this claim on direct appeal, he did not do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71890 - 2011-10-11
limits imposed under § 973.19. While Hicks could have raised this claim on direct appeal, he did not do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71890 - 2011-10-11
COURT OF APPEALS
raising the claims at a later date unless he or she provides a sufficient reason for not previously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133568 - 2015-01-26
raising the claims at a later date unless he or she provides a sufficient reason for not previously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133568 - 2015-01-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
outside the time limits imposed under § 973.19. While Hicks could have raised this claim on direct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=71890 - 2014-09-15
outside the time limits imposed under § 973.19. While Hicks could have raised this claim on direct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=71890 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
by a prisoner, based upon an Alford plea. He claims that: (1) he should have been allowed to withdraw his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51519 - 2014-09-15
by a prisoner, based upon an Alford plea. He claims that: (1) he should have been allowed to withdraw his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51519 - 2014-09-15